Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:20:02.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A multi-disciplinary approach to the development of intensive animal systems for Canada†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. S. Gowe ,
G. R. Barr  and
H. F. Peters
R. S. Gowe
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada
G. R. Barr
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada
H. F. Peters
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada
Get access

Extract

It is indeed an honour to be asked to present the 1974 Sir John Hammond Memorial Lecture, and I face this honour with some trepidation knowing the high esteem held for Sir John and his outstanding contributions to world animal science. As most of you know, Sir John was somewhat of a one-man multi-disciplinary team himself, publishing and researching in the fields of animal breeding, reproductive physiology, meat science and animal nutrition. With the rapid and sometimes almost exponential increase in new findings in each of these areas, one person, even one of Sir John Hammond's stature, would now have great difficulty making significant contributions in the several scientific disciplines closely associated with animal production.

Type
58th Meeting, London, 8 to 10 April 1974: Hammond Memorial Lecture 1974
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972) , Volume 3 , January 1974 , pp. 69 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

The 1974 Sir John Hammond Memorial Lecture presented by the senior author at the Annual Meeting of the British Society of Animal Production, London, April, 1974.

†

Animal Research Institute Contribution No. 536.

References

Barker, J. S. 1968. Genetic aspects of producing more protein in milk. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 23: 72–75.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1973. Intensive animal production. Vet. Rec. 92: 383–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butcher, K. R., Sargent, F. D. and Legates, J. E. 1967. Estimates of genetic parameters for milk constituents and yields. J. Dairy Sci. 50: 185–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickerson, G. E. 1973. Inbreeding and heterosis. Proc. Animal Breeding and Genetics Symp. in Honour of Dr. Jay L. Lush. August, 1972. American Society Animal Science, Champaign, Illinois, pp. 54–77.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. and Russell, W. S. 1968. Some aspects of fertility in purebred and crossbred dairy cattle. Anim. Prod. 10: 465–471.Google Scholar
Ewbank, R. 1969. Behavioural implications of intensive animal husbandry. Outlook on Agriculture 6: 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferron, Danielle 1973. [A preliminary study of the intensification of an indoor sheepmeat production system.] Ecole Nationale Supirieure Fiminine d'Agronomie de Remes (Mimeograph), pp. 47.Google Scholar
Gordon, I. 1973. Control of reproduction in sheep: towards programmed lamb production. J. Dep. Agric. Repub. Ire. 68: 27–75.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. G. 1971. Response to selection of breeding stock for milk solids production. J. Dairy Sci. 54: 191–198.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. G. and Freeman, A. E. 1969. New approach to experimental designs for selection studies in dairy cattle and other species. J. Dairy Sci. 52: 1044–1054.Google Scholar
Pearson, Lucia and McDoweell, R. E. 1968. Crossbreeding of dairy cattle in temperate zones: a review of recent studies. Animal Breeding Abstr. 36: 1–15.Google Scholar
Pelissier, C. L. 1972. Herd breeding problems and their consequences. J. Dairy Sci. 55: 385–391.Google Scholar
Peters, H. F. and Heaney, D. P. 1974. Factors influencing the growth of lambs reared artificially or with their dams. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 54: 9–18.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1964. The use of specialised sire and dam lines in selection for meat production. Anim. Prod. 6: 337–344.Google Scholar
Stapleton, H. N. 1970. Crop production system simulation. Trans. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 13: 110–113.Google Scholar
Stapleton, H. N. and Meyers, R. P. 1971. Modelling subsystems for cotton–the cotton plant simulation. Trans. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 14: 950–953.Google Scholar
Stokes, J. 1974. The university department. Science. N.Y. 183: 902.Google Scholar
Stouffer, J. R. 1969. Techniques for the estimation of the composition of meat animals. In Techniques and Procedures in Animal Science Research (ed. Loosli, J. K., Bogart, Ralph and Terrill, Clair E.), pp. 207–219. American Society of Animal Science, Albany, New York.Google Scholar
Straus, R. 1973. Departments and disciplines: stasis and change. Science. N.Y. 182: 895–898.Google Scholar
Turnbull, J. E., Hickman, C. G. and Lee, A. J. 1969. Animal Research Institute facilities for dairy cattle breeding research. Can. Agric. Engng. 11: 32–37.Google Scholar
Turnbull, J. E., Hore, F. R. and Feldman, M. 1971. A land re-cycling liquid manure system for a large-scale confinement operation in a cold climate. Proc. Inter. Symp. on Livestock Wastes. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. pp. 39–43.Google Scholar
Wolfle, D. 1971. The supernatural department. Science. N.Y. 173: 109.Google Scholar
Young, B. A. and Corbett, J. L. 1972. Maintenance energy requirements of grazing sheep in relation to herbage availability. 1. Caloric estimates. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23: 57–76.Google Scholar