Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:41:28.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of body reserves at farrowing on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

B.P. Mullan
Affiliation:
Animal Science Group, School of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
I.H. Williams
Affiliation:
Animal Science Group, School of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
Get access

Extract

Recent work in the United States (Reese, Moser, Peo, Lewis, Zimmerman, Kinder and Stroup 1982) and in Australia (King and Williams, 1984) has clearly shown that nutrition during lactation can affect the fertility of young sows. If first-litter sows are restricted in food intake during lactation, so that they lose body weight and backfat, they take longer to return to oestrus after weaning than their counterparts fed ad libitum. To reproduce successfully the sow must have some mechanism(s) of monitoring its nutritional status, preferably before conception takes place. It is difficult to imagine mechanisms capable of monitoring body reserves per se. It is more likely that the sow can monitor changes in its body reserves, for example, by measuring the rate of lipid mobilized from adipose tissue or the rate of protein breakdown from muscles, or both.

Crossbred gilts (Landrace x Large White) were selected at about 45 kg body weight (approx 3 months of age) and allocated to treatment according to litter and live weight. A total of 22 groups each of 24 animals was selected. Within each group gilts were fed (13.0 MJ DE/kg, 160 g/kg CP) either ad libitum (High), 2.0 kg/day (Medium) or 1.8 kg/day (Low) from selection through until mating.

Type
Sow Performance
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

King, R.H. and Williams, I.H. 1984. Anim. Prod. 38, 241247.Google Scholar
Reese, D.E., Moser, B.D., Peo, E.R., Lewis, A.J., Zimmerman, D.R., Kinder, J.E. and Stroup, W.W. 1982. J. Anim. Sci. 55, 590598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar