Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:16:43.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of clipping regime and silage quality on the performance of pregnant and lactating ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

Heather J Black
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down, BT26 6DR
D H B Chestnutt
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down, BT26 6DR
Get access

Extract

Winter clipping of breeding ewes has given variable increases in lamb birth weight associated mainly with increased ewe voluntary food intake (Rutter, Laird and Broadbent, 1972; Vipond, King, Inglis and Hunter, 1987). The requirement for energy is greatest during the last six weeks of pregnancy but increasing uterine occupation of rumen volume may limit the ewe's ability to increase intake after clipping in late pregnancy. The additional influence of forage quality on intake after clipping is not clear. The present experiment was designed to study the independent and interacting effects of clipping regime and silage quality on lambing performance.

Sixty Greyface ewes of uniform age were individually penned 14 weeks before lambing. Precision chop silage offered ad libitum was either early cut [188.3 g dry matter (DM)/kg, 155.7 g crude protein (CP)/kg DM, 740 g digestible organic matter (DOM)/kg DM] or late cut (184.5 g DM/kg, 100.9 g CP/kg DM, 689 g DOM/kg DM). For all treatments concentrate feeding was introduced 7 weeks before lambing, on an increasing scale to provide a total of 21 kg/ewe. Silage type was factorially arranged with 6 clipping regimes.

Type
Production and Management of Small Ruminants
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rutter, W., Laird, T. R. and Broadbent, P. J. (1972). Anim. Prod. 14, 127130.Google Scholar
Vipond, J. E., King, Margaret E., Inglis, D. M. and Hunter, E. A. (1987). Anim. Prod. 45, 211221.Google Scholar