Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:24:36.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tracing the Institutional Insinuation of International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Peter J. Spiro
Peter J. Spiro*
Affiliation:
Hofstra University Law School, Hempstead, NY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Law and the Work of Federal and State Legislators
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 95 , 2001 , pp. 50 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Slaughter, Anne-Marie, The Real New World Order, Foreign Aff., Sept.-Oct. 1997, at 183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Judicial Globalization, 40 Va. J. Int’l L. 1103 (2000)Google Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Jesse Helms & Joseph R. Biden,Jr., Unique Visit to Mexico Builds Trust in Its Wake, L.A. Times, May 1, 2001, §2, at 9 (reporting on formal meeting of U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee with Mexican counterpart).

3 See, e.g., Earl H. Fry, The Expanding Role of State and Local Governments in U.S. Foreign Affairs (1998).

4 See Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363 (2000) (striking down Massachusetts procurement measure prohibiting purchases from companies doing business in Burma).

5 See, e.g., Spiro, Peter J., The States and International Human Rights, 66 Fordham L. Rev. 567, 574 (1997)Google Scholar.

6 Academic debate on the role of state governments in international affairs has been especially intense. See, e.g., Curtis A.\Bradley, , The Treaty Power and American Federalism, 97 Mich. L. Rev. 390 (1998)Google Scholar; Goldsmith, Jack L., Federal Courts, Federalism, and Foreign Affairs, 83 Va. L. Rev. 1617 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Golove, David M., Treaty-Making and the Nation: The Historical Foundations of the Nationalist Conception of the Treaty Power, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 1075 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Spiro, Peter J., Foreign Relations Federalism, 70 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1223 (1999)Google Scholar; Swaine, Edward T., Negotiating Federalism: State Bargaining and the Dormant Treaty Power, 49 Duke L J. 1127 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tushnet, Mark, Globalization and Federalism in a Post-Printz World, 36 Tulsa L J. 11 (2000)Google Scholar; Young, Ernest A., Dual Federalism, Concurrent Jurisdiction, and the Foreign Affairs Exception, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2001)Google Scholar.

7 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, Apr. 24, 1963, 21 UST 77, 596 UNTS 261. For a discussion of the most notable episode involving a violation of the convention by state law enforcement authorities, see Agora: Breard, 92 AJIL 666 (1998).