Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:23:49.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Title III of the Helms-Burton Act Does Not Violate International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2017

Brice M. Clagett*
Affiliation:
Covington and Burling, Washington, DC

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Cuba and U.S. Sanctions and Extraterritoriality
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 353 F.2d 47, 51 (2nd Cir. 1965).

2 Mann, F.A., Studies in International Law 385 (1973)Google Scholar.

3 Banco National de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 421 (1964).

4 Id..

5 Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States, Sections 402–416 (1987) (hereafter “Restatement“).

6 Id., Section 402(l)(c).

7 Secretary Christopher, Circular to all diplomatic and consular posts, Sept. 1993, reprinted in Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act: Hearings Before the Subcomm. on Western Hemisphere and Peace Corps Affairs of the Senate Comm. on Foreign Relations, 104th Cong. 1st Sess. 192–93 (1995).

8 Mann, F.A., Further Studies in International Law 186 (1990)Google Scholar.

9 Mann, F.A., Studies in International Law 38586 (1973) (emphasis added)Google Scholar.

10 Seidl-Hohenveldem, Ignaz, Title to Confiscated Foreign Property and Public International Law, 56 AJIL 507, 509 (1962)Google Scholar.

11 The Rose Mary, [1953] 1 WLR 246.

12 Restatement, Section 701.