Article contents
The Structural Rules of Transnational Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Sauce for the Gander: Foreign Extraterritorial Regulation of U.S. Parties
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2003
References
1 Dodge, William S., Breaking the Public Law Taboo, 43 Harv. Int’l L.J. 161, 162 (2002)Google Scholar.
2 See, e.g., Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law §402 (1987).
3 See, e.g., E.E.O.C. v. Arabian Am. Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244, 248 (1991), rev’d by statute on other grounds, 42 U.S.C. §§2000e, 12111, 12112 (2000).
4 See Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 29 ILM 1413 (1990).
5 See Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 (Dec. 22, 2000), 2001 Oj. (L 12) 1.
6 See Dodge, William S., Antitrust and the Draft Hague Judgments Convention, 32 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 363, 381 (2001)Google Scholar.
7 See (Austl. 2002), 42 ILM 41 (2003).
8 Id, at 49.
9 See, e.g., Reveil v. Lidov, 317 F.3d 467, 475-76 (5th Cir. 2002); Young v. New Haven Advocate, 315 F.3d 256, 262-63 (4th Cir. 2002).
10 See Yahoo!, Inc. v. La Ligue Contra le Racisme et l’Antisémitisme, 169 F. Supp. 2d 1181, 1192-93 (N.D. Cal. 2001).
11 See Shaffer, Gregory, Extraterritoriality in a Globalizing World: The Case of Data Privacy Regulation, 97 ASIL Proc. 314, 317 (2003)Google Scholar.
12 Dodge, supra note 6, at 374-80.
13 See Directive 95/46/EC (Oct. 24, 1995), 1995 O.J. (L 281) 31; Shaffer, supra note 11, at 314.
- 1
- Cited by