Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T23:01:26.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Douglas E. Rosenthal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Douglas E. Rosenthal
Douglas E. Rosenthal*
Affiliation:
Foreign Commerce Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Extraterritoriality: Conflict and Overlap in National and International Regulation
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 74 , 1980 , pp. 38 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

17 United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945).

18 In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation, MDL 342 No 76C 3830 (N.D. I11.); See e.g. 1980-1 Trade Cas. § 63, 183 (7th Qir. 1980).

19 In Re Investigation of World Arrangements with Relation to the Prod., Transp., Ref. & Distrib. of Petroleum, 13 F.R.D. 280, (D.D.C. 1952). The grand jury was ultimately discharged without returning an indictment, and a civil case was thereupon filed. See United States v. Standard Oil Co (N.J.), 23 F.R.D. 1 (S.D.N.Y. 1958).

20 In Re Grand Jury Investigation of the Shipping Indus., 186 F. Supp. 298 (D.D.C. 1960). This grand jury did not return an indictment, nor was a civil suit filed.

21 United States v. Watchmakers of Switzerland Information Center, Inc. 1963 Trade Cas. § 70,600 (S.D.N.Y. 1962).

22 United States v. Watchmakers of Switzerland Information Center, Inc. 1965 Trade Cas. § 71,352 (S.D.N.Y. 1965).

23 American Law Institute (1965).

24 Canada, Australia, France, and Great Britain have filed amicus briefs expressing concern with the continuation of the Uranium Antitrust Litigation referred to in footnote 18, supra.

25 See Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of America, N.T.&S.A., 549 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1976).