Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-sp8b6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:16:34.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Charles H. Brower, II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Charles H. Brower II
Charles H. Brower II*
Affiliation:
Croft of International Law and Jessie D. Puckett Jr. in Law, University of Mississippi School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fair and Equitable Treatment Under NAFTA’s Investment Chapter
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 96 , 2002 , pp. 9 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 North American Free Trade Agreement, Dec. 17, 1992, Can.-Mex.-U.S., art. 1105, 32 ILM 605 [hereinafter NAFTA].

2 NAFTA Free Trade Commission, Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions (July 31, 2001), §B, available at <http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/tna-nac/NAFTA-Interpr-e.asp> [hereinafter Notes].

3 NAFTA, supra note 1,at art. 1131(1).

4 See Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 23, 1969, 1155 UNTS 331 [hereinafter Vienna Convention].

5 See id., art. 31(1)-(3).

6 NAFTA, supra note 1, at ch. 11.

7 Id. at art. 1131(2).

8 According to Article 2202, the NAFTA parties may agree on any “modification of or addition to” the NAFTA, but such amendments become “an integral part” of the NAFTA only upon approval by the NAFTA parties “in accordance with the applicable legal procedures of each Party.” See id. at art. 2202, 32 ILM at 702.

9 See id. at art. 102(2), 32 ILM at 297.

10 See id. at art. 1132(1)–(2), 32 ILM at 645-46 (audiorizing the Free Trade Commission to resolve differences about the application of certain Annexes to the NAFTA).

11 See United Mexican States v. Metalclad Corp., [2001] BCSC 664, Reasons for Judgment of Hon. Mr. Justice Tysoe, available at <http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/tna-nac/trans-2may.pdf>; see Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Canada, Award on the Merits of Phase 2 (Apr. 10,2001 ), available at <http://www.appletonlaw.com/4b3P&T.htm>; see S.O. Myers, Inc . v. Canada, Partial Award (Nov. 13, 2000), available at <http://www.appletonlaw.com/4b2myers.htm>; Metalclad Corp. v. United Mexican States, Award (Aug. 30, 2000), available at <http://www.worldbank.org/icsid/cases/awards.htm>.

12 Notes, supra note 2.

13 Id.

14 See Vienna Convention, supra note 4, at art. 31 (3).

15 See Methanex Corp. v. United States (Sept. 6, 2001), Fourth Opinion of Professor Sir Robert Jennings, Q.C., available at <http://www.naftaclaims.com>.