Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T21:38:59.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Realism Versus Legalism in International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Edwin D. Williamson
Edwin D. Williamson*
Affiliation:
Sullivan & Cromwell, Washington, DC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Realism and Legalism
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 96 , 2002 , pp. 262 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 UN Charter art. 2, para. 4.

2 Convention on the Rights of the Child, Nov. 20, 1989, 28 ILM. 1448 (1989).

3 Id.

4 Id. at art. 6.

5 LaGrand (F.R.G. v. U.S.), Judgment, 2001 ICJ rep. 104 (June 27).

6 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

7 Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920).

8 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Aug. 12, 1949, 6 UST 3316, 75 UNTS 135.

9 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 37 IL. 999 (1998).

10 Baltasar Garzon, The West Shares the Blame, Fin. Times, Oct. 3, 2001.

11 Please provide citation.

12 UN Charter art. 51.

13 UN Charter art. 7.

14 UN Charter art 25.

15 Id. at art. 103.