Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:20:21.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Popular Sovereignty: The Elusive Norm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Brad R. Roth
Brad R. Roth*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Implementing Democratization: What Role for International Organizations?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 91 , 1997 , pp. 363 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Franck, Thomas, Democracy as a Human Right, in Human Rights: an Agenda for the Next Century 73, 75 (Henkin, Louis & Hargrove, John Lawrence eds., 1994)Google Scholar.

2 Fox, Gregory, Closing Comments, National Sovereignty Revisited: Perspectives on the Emerging Norm of Democracy in International Law , 86 Proc. Am. Soc’y Int’l L. 249, 270-71 (1992)Google Scholar.

3 See Fairness in International Law and Institutions, ch. 4 (1995) (largely reproducing Franck, Thomas M., The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance, 86 Am. J. Int’l L. 46 (1992))CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Slaughter, Anne-Marie, International Law in a World of Liberal States, 6 Eur. J. Int’l L. 503, 508 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See, e.g., Thomas Franck, Fairness in International Law and Institutions 138 (1995). “The infant [global democratic] entitlement is sufficiently widely understood to be almost universally celebrated. It is welcomed from Malagache to Mongolia, in the streets, the universities and the legislatures . . . ” It is, he writes, a “cosmic, but unmysterius change, ” in which governments “no longer blinded by the totalitarian miasma” have come to recognize the advantages of democracy. Id. at 85-86.

6 Koskenniemi, Martu, “IntolerantDemocracies”: A Reaction, 37 Harv. Int’l L. J. 231, 234 (1996)Google Scholar

7 Salans, Hertzfeld & Heilbronn, London.