Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:57:07.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mainstreaming a Gender Perspective in the Work of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Christine Ainetter Brautigam*
Affiliation:
UN Division for the Advancement of Women

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Compliance with the International Human Rights of Women
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The human rights treaty bodies are the committees of experts established under the major international human rights instruments to monitor implementation of the instruments in states parties. They are: the Human Rights Committee (HRC), established under the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), established under the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), established under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination; the Committee against Torture (CAT), established under the Convention against Toiture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), established under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women; and the Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), established under the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

2 U.N. Doc. CERD/C/SR. 1166, para. 54. Michael Banton, Chairperson of CERD, emphasized this view in his statement at the Roundtable of human rights treaty bodies on human rights approaches to women’s health, held December 9-11, 1996 in Glen Cove, NY.

3 U.N. Doe. CCPR/C/79/Add.72, para. 15 (Nov. 11, 1996).

4 Report of the Human Rights Committee, paras. 195, 207, U.N. Doc. A/51/40 (1996).

5 General Comment 4, 13th Sess., U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/l/Rev.2 (1981).

6 See, e.g., communication No. 35/1978, Aumeeruddy-Cziflra v. Mauritius, reprinted in 1 Selected Decisions of the Human Rights Committee under the Optional Protocol, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1; Communications No. 172/1984, Broeks v. the Netherlands, and 182/1984, Zwaan-de Vries v. the Netherlands, reprinted in 2 Selected Decisions of the Human Rights Committee under the Optional Protocol, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2; communication No. 202/1986, Avellanal v. Peru, U.N. Doc. A/44/40 (1989).