Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:34:56.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction and Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

Gregory Shaffer
Gregory Shaffer*
Affiliation:
University of California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Theorizing Transnational Legal Orders
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 110 , 2016 , pp. 63 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Philip C. Jessup, Transnational Law 2 (1956).

2 Koh, Harold Hongju, Transnational Legal Process, 75 Neb. L. Rev. 181, 183–84 (1996)Google Scholar. Koh viewed transnational legal process as “seeking to shape and transform personal identity” so that political elites and broader societies “internalize” international law norms. He contended that “[r]epeated participation in the transnational legal process … helps to reconstruct the national interests of the participating nations.” Koh, Harold Hongju, The 1998 Frankel Lecture: Bringing International Law Home, 35 Hous. L. Rev. 623, 634 (1998)Google Scholar.

3 For further discussion, see Terence C. Halliday & Gregory Shaffer, Transnational Legal Orders, in Transnational Legal Orders 21–28 (Terence C. Halliday & Gregory Shaffer eds., 2015).

4 For instance, a comprehensive review of regime theory published in 1997 by Hasenclever, et al. had no entry for “law” in the index, and the term “international law” is scarcely found in the entire text. See Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer & Volker Rittberger, Theories of International Regimes (1997).