Article contents
The Influence of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Customary International Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0272503700060699/resource/name/firstPage-S0272503700060699a.jpg)
- Type
- Investor-State Disputes and the Development of International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2004
References
1 Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 428-30 (1964).
2 United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3281 (XXIX) of December 12, 1974, Article 2.
3 CME Czech Republic B.V. v. Czech Republic, Final Award of March 14, 2003, paras. 497-98.
4 Mondev International Ltd. v. United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF) 99/2, para. 117 (Oct. 11, 2002).
5 Report of the International Law Commission covering the work of its twelfth session, 2 Yearbook of the International Law Commission 145, UN Doc. A/4425 (I960). “Bilateral consular treaties have exercised a most important influence on the development of customary international law on consuls, now codified in the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.” ( Baxter, R.R., Treaties and Custom, 129 Recueil Des Cours 1970 (I) 25, 87.Google Scholar)
- 33
- Cited by