Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T11:53:39.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Borders of the Imagination: The State in Feminist International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Karen Knop
Karen Knop*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Theoretical Perspectives on the Transformation of Sovereignty
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 88 , 1994 , pp. 14 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Knop, Karen, Re/Statements: Feminism and State Sovereignty in International Law , 3 Transnat’l l. & Contemp. Probs. 293 (1993)Google Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions Of International Relations Theory, (V. Spike Peterson ed., 1992).

3 Henkin, Louis, The Mythology of Sovereignty, in State Sovereignty: The Challenge of a Changing World , 21 Proc. Canadian Council On International Law 15, 18 (1992)Google Scholar.

4 Lauterpacht, Hersch, Private Law Sources And Analogies Of International Law 91-96 (1970)Google Scholar.

5 McConnell, Moira L., Making Sense: International Law and its Developing Ethos of Care: “The Sound of One Hand Clapping” (Oct. 1991) (on file with author)Google Scholar.

6 Gunning, Isabelle R., Modernizing Customary International Law: The Challenge of Human Rights, 31 Va. J. Int’l L. 211 (1991)Google Scholar.

7 Andrea Dworkin, Intercourse 122, 133, 137 (1987).

8 See generally Chinkin, Christine M., Peace and Force in International Law, in Reconceiving Reality: Women And International Law 203, 204-210 (DorindaG.Dallmeyered., 1993) [hereinafter RECONCEIVING REALITY]Google Scholar.

9 See, e.g., Pateman, Carole, Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy, in Public And Private In Social Life 281 (S. I. Benn & G. F. Gaus eds., 1983)Google Scholar.

10 Olsen, Frances E., International Law: Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Distinction, in supra note 8, at 157, 161-62Google Scholar.

11 Gardam, Judith G., The Law of Armed Conflict: A Feminist Perspective, in Human Rights In The Twenty-First Century: A Global Challenge 419,422-424,430 (Kathleen E. Mahoney & Paul Mahoney eds., 1993)Google Scholar.

12 Engle, Karen, 86 Asil Proc. 253, 254 (1992)Google Scholar.

13 Engle, Karen, After the Collapse of the Public/Private Distinction: Strategizing Women’s Rights, in Reconceiving Reality, supra note 8, at 143, 148-49Google Scholar.

1 Tesón, Ferando, The Kantian Theory of International Law , Colum. L. Rev. (1992)Google Scholar.