Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:56:21.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Are the Archetypal “Good” Aliens?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Harold Hongju Koh
Harold Hongju Koh*
Affiliation:
Yale Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Immigration Politics and Sovereignty: National Responses to "Bad" Aliens?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 88 , 1994 , pp. 450 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Martti Koskenniemi, From Apology To Utopia: The Structure Of International Legal Argument (1989).

1 United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144, 152-53 n.4 (1938).

2 403 U.S. 365(1971).

3 U.S. ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537, 543 (1950).

4 130 U.S. 581 (1889).

* See Address by Justice Blackmun at the ASIL Annual Dinner, p. 383.

5 Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, 113 S.Ct. 2549 (1993) (discussed in Blackmun, Harry A., The Supreme Court and the Law of Nations , 1994 ASIL Proceedings at 385)Google Scholar.

6 Yang v. Maugans, No. 94-7060 (3d Cir. argued Mar. 24, 1994).

7 Neuman, Gerald, Buffer Zones Against Refugees: Dublin, Schengen, and the German Asylum Amendment , 33 Va. J. Int’l L. 503 (1993)Google Scholar.