Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-gglxz Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-04-24T02:25:47.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Donald Francis Donovan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Donald Francis Donovan
Donald Francis Donovan*
Affiliation:
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (New York); New York University School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Trends in International Investment Treaty Law
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 105 , 2011 , pp. 330 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Christoph H. Schreuer, the ICSID Convention: A Commentary 757-58 (2001).

2 See Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Para. v. U.S.), Memorial of Republic of Paraguay, paras. 3.15— 3.24 (Oct. 9, 1998), available at www.ICJ-cij.org/docket/ffles/99/13106.pdf.

3 Maffezini v. Spain, ICSID Case No. Arb/97/7, Procedural Order No. 2, para. 9 (Oct. 28, 1999).

4 LaGrand Case (Ger. v. U.S.), Judgment, 2001 I.C.J. 466, 502-03 (June 27).

5 LaGrand Case (Ger. v. U.S.), Dissenting Opinion of Judge Buergenthal, 2001 I.C.J. 548, para. 1 (June 27).

6 Pey Casado & President Allende Found, v. Chile, ICSID Case No. Arb/98/2, Decision on Provisional Measures, para. 17 (Sept. 25, 2001).

7 Id, para. 2.

8 Denunciation of Treaty of November 2nd, 1865, Between China and Belgium (Belg. v. China), Order, 1927 Pcij (ser. A) No. 8, 7 (Jan. 8).

9 Nuclear Tests Case (Austl. v. Fr.), Order, 1973 I.C.J. 99, para. 27 (June 22).

10 LaGrand (Ger. v. U.S.), Order, 1999 I.C.J. 9, para. 24 (Mar. 3).

11 Aegean Sea Continental Shelf (Greece v. Turk.), Order, 1976 I.C.J. 3, para. 33 (Sept. 11).

12 Cemex Caracas Invs. B.V. & Cemex Caracas Ii Invs. B.V. v. Venezuela, ICSID Case No. Arb/08/15, Decision on Provisional Measures, para. 49 (Mar. 3, 2010).

13 Burlington Res., Inc. v. Ecuador, ICSID Case No. Arb/08/5, Procedural Order No. 1, para. 83 (June 29, 2009).

14 Perenco Ecuador Ltd. v. Ecuador, ICSID Case No. Arb/08/6, Decision on Provisional Measures, para. 53 (May 8, 2009).

15 CEMEX, supra note 12, para. 55.

16 Id.

17 Id., para. 46.

18 Paushok, CJSC Golden East Co. & CJSC Vostokneftegaz Co. v. Mongolia, Uncitral Arb. Trib., Order on Interim Measures, paras. 68-69 (Sept. 2, 2008).

19 Burlington, supra note 13, para. 81 (citing Occidental Petroleum Corp., Occidental Explor. & Prod. Co. v. Ecuador, ICSID Case No. Arb/06/11, Decision on Provisional Measures, para. 93 (Aug. 17, 2007)).

20 Maffezini, supra note 3, para. 20.

21 Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Arg. v. Ura.), Separate Opinion of Judge Abraham, 2006 I.C.J. 113, 141 (July 13).

22 Id. at 138.

23 Id.

24 Id. at 139.

25 Id. at 140-41.

26 Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belg. v. Sen.), Order, 2009 ICJ Gen. List No. 144, para. 57 (May 28).

27 Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicar.), Order, 2011 ICJ Gen. List No. 150, para. 53 (Mar. 8) (citing Belgium v. Senegal, supra note 26, paras. 56-57).

28 See Costa Rica v. Nicaragua, supra note 27, Separate Opinion of Judge Sepúlveda-Amor, paras. 12-16.

29 Paushok, supra note 18, paras. 45, 56.

30 Id., para. 56 (footnotes omitted).

31 Occidental Petroleum Corp., Occidental Explor. & Prod. Co. v. Ecuador, ICSID Case No. Arb/06/11, Decision on Provisional Measures, paras. 64, 68 (Aug. 17, 2007).

32 Id., para. 64.

33 Burlington, supra note 13, para. 53.

34 See Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Arg. v. Uru.), Order, 2007 I.C.J. 3, paras. 42^3 (Jan. 23).

35 See id., para. 50.

36 Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Arg. v. Uru.), Declaration of Judge Buergenthal, 2007 I.C.J. 21, paras. 8- 9 (Jan. 23).

37 Id., para. 11.

38 CEMEX, supra note 12, para. 65.

39 Id.

40 Burlington, supra note 13, para. 60.