Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:38:43.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Charles N. Brower

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Charles N. Brower
Charles N. Brower*
Affiliation:
Of 20 Essex Street Chambers, London; Judge, Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Challenges of Arbitrators in International Investment Disputes: Standards and Outcomes
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 423 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 London Court of International Arbitration, Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.lcia.org//Frequently_Asked_Questions.aspx (last visited May 5, 2014).

2 Urbaser S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26, Decision on Claimants’ Proposal to Disqualify Professor Campbell McLachlan, Arbitrator (Aug. 12, 2010), https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC1690_En&caseId=C255.

3 Campbell Mclachlan, Laurence Shore & Matthew Weiniger, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles 257 (2007).

4 Urbaser, para. 22.

5 Id. para. 48.

6 Id. para. 51.

7 See Urbaser, Decision on Jurisdiction, para. 203 (Dec. 19, 2011), http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1324.pdf (deciding that there was “no need to examine whether the Most Favoured Nation Clause (MFN clause) contained in Article IV(2) of the BIT” was applicable because “Claimants were not required to comply with the 18 month rule under the facts presented” to the Tribunal).

8 Perenco Ecuador Ltd., ICSID Case No. ARB/08/06, Decision on Challenge to Arbitrator (Dec. 8, 2009), http://italaw.com/documents/PerencovEcuador-Challenge.pdf.

9 International Bar Association, IBA Guidelines on Conflict of Interest in International Arbitration (2004).

10 See ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings, Rule 8(2) (2006) (“If the arbitrator was appointed by one of the parties, the Tribunal shall promptly consider the reasons for his resignation and decide whether it consents thereto.”).

11 Background information on the case, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/2, is available at http://www.italaw.com/cases/829 (last visited May 6, 2014).

12 Burlington Resources, Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/5, Decision on the Proposal for Disqualification of Professor Francisco Orrego Vicuña (Dec. 13, 2013), https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC3972_En&caseId=C300.