Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:02:09.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reexamining Export Controls from the Demand Side

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Dorinda G. Dallmeyer*
Affiliation:
Dean Rusk Center for International and Comparative Law, University of Georgia

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Nuclear Future? Global Nonproliferation Efforts
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cole, and Lubman, , Bombs Away: Weapons Merchants Are Going Great Guns in Post-Cold War Era , Wall St. J. , Jan. 28, 1994, at Al, col. 6 Google Scholar.

2 Dallmeyer, , The Future Role of the United Nations in Disarmament: The Iraq Experience , 87 ASIL Proc. 89, 92 (1993)Google Scholar.

3 Tsipis, and Morrison, , Arming for Peace , 50 Bull. Atom. Sci. 38, 41-42 (Mar./Apr. 1994)Google Scholar.

4 Supra note 1, at A7 (summarizing data reported by the U.S. Congressional Research Service, Electronic Industries Association and Stockholm International Peace Resarch Institute).

5 Supra note 3, at 39.

6 Supra note 1, at Al.

7 Export Administration Act (EAA) of 1994: Hearings Before the Subcomm. on Int’l Finance and Monetary Policy of the Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Feb. 24,1994 (quoted in statement of Norman Wulf, Acting Assistant Director, Bureau of Nonproliferation and Regional Arms Control).