Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:31:51.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Provisional Measures Prescribed by ITLOS and Marine Environmental Protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Yoshifumi Tanaka
Yoshifumi Tanaka*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Dispute Settlement System of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: An Assessment After 20 Years
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 365 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Robert Kolb, The International Court of Justice 616 (2013).

2 1833 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force Nov. 17, 1994).

3 Benzing, Markus, Community Interests in the Procedure of International Courts and Tribunals, 5 Law & Prac. Int’l Cts. & Tribunals 369, 381–82, 407 (2006)Google Scholar.

4 MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom), Provisional Measures, ITLOS Case No. 10, Order of 3 Dec. 2001, 41 ILM 405, 416, para. 89 (2002).

5 Case Concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and Around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore), Provisional Measures, ITLOS Case No. 12, Order of 8 Oct. 2013, para. 106(1)(a), available at https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_12/Order.08.10.03.E.pdf [hereafter Land Reclamation Case].

6 Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Provisional Measures, Case No. 3 and 4, Order of 27 August 1999, 38 ILM 1624, 1635–36, para. 90 (1999).

7 M/V Saiga (No. 2) Case (Saint Vincent and Grenadine v. Guinea), Order of 11 March 1998, 37 ILM 1204, 1215, para. 52(3) (1998).

8 2 ITLOS Y.B. 36 (1998).

9 Memorial Submitted by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 40, para. 75, available at https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_2/merits/memorial_svg.pdf.

10 Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases, supra note 6, at 1636, para. 90(2).

11 3 ITLOS Y.B. 51 (1999).

12 In the Arctic Sunrise case, however, the Russian Federation declared that it did not intend to participate in the ITLOS proceedings. Embassy of the Russian Federation, note verbale, Berlin, (Oct. 22, 2013), http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.22/Note_verbale_Russian_Federation_eng.pdf.

13 Matsukawa, Rui & Ariyoshi, Rumi, Southern Bluefin Tuna Case—Australia and New Zealand v. Japan: Reference Materials (in Japanese), 100 J. Int’l L. & Dipl. 414, 431–32 (2001)Google Scholar.