Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T01:53:24.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Permissive Law on the International Use of Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ian Hurd*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Use of Armed Force: Are We Approaching Normative Collapse?
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Mr. Farer, Mr. Arsanjani, and Mr. Mearsheimer did not contribute remarks for the Proceedings.

1 On informal amendment of the Charter, see Hurd, Ian, Security Council Reform: Informal Membership and Practice, in The Once and Future Security Council (Russett, Bruce ed., 1997)Google Scholar. On the legality of humanitarian war, see Thomas Franck, Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks Ch. 10 (2002) and Hurd, Ian, Is Humanitarian Intervention Legal? The Rule of Law in an Incoherent World, 25 Ethics & Int’l Aff. (Summer 2011)Google Scholar.

2 Franck, Thomas, Who Killed Article 2(4)? Or: Changing Norms Governing the Use of Force by States, 64 AJIL 809, 810 (1970)Google Scholar.

3 Michael Glennon, Why the Security Council Failed (2003).

4 Peter Cane, Responsibility in Law and Morality (2002). Scott Veitch, Law and Irresponsibility: on the Legitimation of Human Suffering (2007).

5 Andrew Guzman, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (2007).

6 Scott Veitch, supra note 4.

7 I side with Louis Henkin in his exchange with Thomas Franck in 1970-71 over the political impact of the ban on war. Henkin, Louis, The Reports of the Death of Article 2(4) are Greatly Exaggerated, 65 AJIL (1971)Google Scholar; Thomas Franck, supra note 2.

8 Steinberg, Richard, Wanted—Dead or Alive: Realism in International Law, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Dunoff, Jeffrey L. & Pollack, Mark A. eds., 2013)Google Scholar.

9 See, e.g., John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (2014, updated); Ian Hurd, IL/IR Book Discussion: Comment on Richard Steinberg, “Wanted Dead or Alive: Realism in International Law,” Opinio Juris (Sept. 16, 2013, 12:30PM EDT), http://opiniojuris.org/2013/09/16/ilir-book-discussion-comment-on-steinberg/. Hurd, Ian, Constructivism, in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Reus-Smit, Christian & Snidal, Duncan eds., 2008)Google Scholar.

10 Hurd, Ian, The International Rule of Law and the Domestic Analogy, 4 Global Constitutionalism (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Taylor, Charles, To Follow a Ruleo, in Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (Calhoun, Craig, LiPuma, Edward, & Postone, Moishe eds., 1993)Google Scholar. Ingo Venzke, How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (2014).

12 Jack L. Goldsmith & Eric A. Posner, The Limits of International Law (2006).

13 Steinberg, supra note 8.

14 Brian Tamanaha, On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (2004).