No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Introductory Remarks by Natalie Klein
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2018
Extract
This panel examined the operation of International Mass Claims Commissions (IMCC), which are ad hoc international judicial institutions created to resolve specific international disputes. IMCCs generally involve a great variety and number of claims and claimants, thus providing a distinctive means to resolve international disputes. This panel seeks to evaluate the effectiveness and viability of IMCCs as international dispute resolution mechanisms. Looking in particular at the examples set by the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, the UN Claims Commission, and the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission, the speakers assess strengths and weaknesses of these unique institutions. Panelists also considered the use of IMCCs in future situations, as an alternative to standing international tribunals.
- Type
- Are International Claims Commissions Effective Dispute Resolution Mechanisms?
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © by The American Society of International Law 2018
Footnotes
Ms. Brilmayer did not contribute remarks for the Proceedings. Her full paper, “Understanding ‘IMCCs’: Compensation and Closure in the Formation and Function of International Mass Compensation Commissions”, will be published in 43(2) Yale J. Int'l L. (2018).
This panel was convened at 11:00 a.m., Thursday, April 13, 2017, by its moderator, Natalie Klein of Macquarie University Law School, who introduced the panelists: Lea Brilmayer of Yale Law School; John Crook of the Administrative Tribunal of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and George Washington University Law School; Chiara Giorgetti of the University of Richmond School of Law; and Jeremy K. Sharpe of Shearman & Sterling LLP.*
References
This panel was convened at 11:00 a.m., Thursday, April 13, 2017, by its moderator, Natalie Klein of Macquarie University Law School, who introduced the panelists: Lea Brilmayer of Yale Law School; John Crook of the Administrative Tribunal of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and George Washington University Law School; Chiara Giorgetti of the University of Richmond School of Law; and Jeremy K. Sharpe of Shearman & Sterling LLP.*