Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:41:34.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Law in Domestic Legal Systems: An Empirical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pierre-Hugues Verdier  and
Mila Versteeg
Pierre-Hugues Verdier
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Mila Versteeg
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
New Voices in International Law: Empirical Perspectives on International Law
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 376 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Starke, J.G., Monism and Dualism in the Theory of International Law, 17 Brit. Y.B. Int’l L. 66 (1936)Google Scholar; Borchard, Edwin, The Relation Between International Law and Municipal Law, 27 Va. L. Rev. 137 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See, e.g., Jackson, John H., Status of Treaties in Domestic Legal Systems: A Policy Analysis, 86 AJIL 310 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; International Law And Domestic Legal Systems: Incorporation, Transformation And Persuasion (Dinah Shelton ed., 2011).

3 See, e.g., Shelton, supra note 2.

4 See, e.g., Treaty Making: Expression of Consent by States to be Bound by a Treaty (Council of Europe ed., 2001); National Treaty Law and Practice (Duncan B. Hollis et al. eds., 2005); The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement (David Sloss ed., 2009).

5 See Ginsburg, Tom et al., Commitment and Diffusion: Why Constitutions Incorporate International Law, 2008 U. Ill. L. Rev. 201 (2008)Google Scholar; Hathaway, Oona, Treaty’s End: The Past, Present, and Future of International Lawmaking in the United States, 117 Yale L.J. 1236 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See Kumm, Mattias, The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis, 15 Eur. J. Int’l L. 907 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court] Mar. 18, 2014, Docket No. 2 BvR 1390/12 (Ger.); Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court] Feb. 28, 2012, Docket No. 2 BvE 8/11 (Ger.); Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court] Sept. 7, 2011, Docket No. 2 BvR 987/10 (Ger.).