Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T20:01:14.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hollow Victory: Humanitarian Intervention and Protection of Minorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

W. Michael Reisman
W. Michael Reisman*
Affiliation:
Yale University Law School; Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Protecting Minorities: Lessons of International Peacekeeping
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 91 , 1997 , pp. 431 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 But not always. Consider, for example, the Syrian intervention in Lebanon in 1982, with the tacit approval of the Arab League and the Security Council. To date, the forces of Syria remain in Lebanon.

2 Stromseth, Jane E., Self-Determination, Secession and Humanitarian Intervention by the United Nations, 85 Proc. Am. Soc’y Int’l L. 370, 374 (1991)Google Scholar.

3 There is, as Professor Stromseth has said, “a developing consensus that protection of the rights of minorities is a matter of international concern.” Id. at 374.

4 S.C. Res. 688, reprinted in 30 I.L.M. 858 (1991).

5 Id.

6 See Note, , Hungary and a New Paradigm for the Protection of Ethnic Minorities in Central and Eastern Europe, 32 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 673 (1995)Google Scholar.