Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:04:59.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparative Look at Domestic Enforcement of International Tribunal Judgments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Lori F. Damrosch*
Affiliation:
Columbia University School of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Comparative Look at Domestic Enforcement of International Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See A.M. Stuyt, Survey of International Arbitrations 1794-1970 (1972) (identifying only 3 out of 443 arbitrations in which the losing party refused to comply, and only 13 others in which difficulties arose).

2 Société Commerciale de Belgique, Judgment, 1939 PCIJ (ser. A/B) No. 78 (June 15).

3 Société Commerciale de Belgique c. État hellénique et Banque de Grèce, Brussels Civil Tribunal (1951), noted in 47 AJIL 508 (1953).

4 Corfu Channel (U.K. v. Albania), Merits, 1949 ICJ Rep. 4 (Apr. 9); Id., Judgment, at 244 (Dec. 15).

5 Schulte, Constanze, Compliance With Decisions of the International Court of Justice 95 (2004)Google Scholar.

6 Monetary Gold (Italy v. France, U.K., U.S.), Judgment, 1954 ICJ Rep. 19 (June 15).

7 Tehran Hostages (U.S. v. Iran), Provisional Measures, 1979 ICJ Rep. 7 (Dec. 15); Tehran Hostages (U.S. v. Iran), Judgment, 1980 ICJ Rep. 3 (May 24).

8 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. U.S.), 1986 ICJ Rep. 14 (June 27).

9 Committee of U.S. Citizens Living in Nicaragua v. Reagan, 856 F.2d 929 (D.C. Cir. 1988).

10 LaGrand (Germany v. U.S.), Judgment, 2001 ICJ Rep. 104 (June 27).

11 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 3, Annex Vi, art. 39 (Unclos).

12 Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363 (2000).

13 Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Dem. Rep. Congo v. Belgium), 2002 ICJ 3.

14 For details on Belgian implementation of Arrest Warrant, see Schulte, supra note 5, at 269-271. Professor, Georg-August-University Göttingen.