Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:14:59.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Approach of the Courts to Foreign Affairs and National Security: A View from New Zealand and the Hague

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kenneth Keith
Kenneth Keith*
Affiliation:
International Court of Justice (2006–2015)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Approach of Courts to Foreign Affairs and National Security
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 108 , 2014 , pp. 73 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Mr. Mance and Mr. Kavanaugh did not contribute remarks for the Proceedings.

1 Rex v. Dodd (1874) 2 NZCA 598.

2 (1927) PCIJ Reps. A/10.

3 Close v. Maxwell [1945] NZLR 688.

4 See the cases assembled in New Zealand Law Commission, Final Report on Emergencies paras. 5.105–123 and Appendix C (1991) (referring to cases from Australia, Canada, India, Malaysia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom).

5 Choudry v. Att’y-General [1999] 2 NZLR 582, 590–93.

6 [1999] 2 NZLR 582, 593–97.

7 [1999] 3 NZLR 399, 403–06.

8 Id. at 407–08; for the dissent, see 408–23.

9 See, e.g., The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (Bannelier et al. eds., 2012), chapter 8.

10 Att’y-General of New Zealand v. Zaoui (No. 2) 2006 1 NZLR 289.