No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Approach of the Courts to Foreign Affairs and National Security: A View from New Zealand and the Hague
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
- Type
- The Approach of Courts to Foreign Affairs and National Security
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015
References
* Mr. Mance and Mr. Kavanaugh did not contribute remarks for the Proceedings.
1 Rex v. Dodd (1874) 2 NZCA 598.
2 (1927) PCIJ Reps. A/10.
3 Close v. Maxwell [1945] NZLR 688.
4 See the cases assembled in New Zealand Law Commission, Final Report on Emergencies paras. 5.105–123 and Appendix C (1991) (referring to cases from Australia, Canada, India, Malaysia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom).
5 Choudry v. Att’y-General [1999] 2 NZLR 582, 590–93.
6 [1999] 2 NZLR 582, 593–97.
7 [1999] 3 NZLR 399, 403–06.
8 Id. at 407–08; for the dissent, see 408–23.
9 See, e.g., The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (Bannelier et al. eds., 2012), chapter 8.
10 Att’y-General of New Zealand v. Zaoui (No. 2) 2006 1 NZLR 289.