No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
An Empirical Analysis of Investment Treaty Awards
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Investment Law, Dispute Resolution, and the Development Promise: Back to the Future
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007
References
1 North Carolina Law Review (forthcoming), available in draft form at <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=969257>.
2 United Nations Commission on Trade and Development, The Entry into Force of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), IIA Monitor No. 3 (2006), at <http://www.UNCTAD.org/en/docs/webiteiia20069_en.pdf>.
3 See North Carolina Law Review article for a description of the methodology.
4 It also excludes preliminary decisions and/or post-award activity by national courts and/or ad hoc committees.
5 Refer to the North Carolina Law Review article for a full discussion of the comments and attributions made in connection with the claims discussed in these remarks.
6 Priest, George L & Klein, Benjamin, The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, 13 J. Legal Stud. 1 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 See supra note 2.
8 Michael D. Goldhaber Madame La Présidente : A Woman Who Sits as President of a Major Arbitral Tribunal Is a Rare Creature. Why?, Am. Law: Focus Europe, Summer 2004, at <http://www.americanlawyer.com/focuseurope/arbitration04.html>.
9 Yves Dezalay & Bryan G. Garth, Dealing in Virtue 10 (1996).
10 Paulsson, Jan, Ethics, Elitims, Eligibility, 14 J. Int’l Arb. 13, 19 (1997)Google Scholar.