Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:42:22.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Determination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Rupert Emerson*
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fourth Session
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘ ‘ The principle of self-determination, directed towards independence, is, as the ‘principio di nazionaliti’ in the 19th century, a revolutionary principle and the frequency with which it is invoked, proves this to be a basically revolutionary epoch.” Josef L. Kunz, “The Principle of Self-Determination of Peoples, Particularly in the Practice of the United Nations,” in 1 Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Volker 132 (Miinchen: Verlag Eobert Lerche, 1964).

2 Rupert Emerson, “ Self -Determination Revisited in the Era of Decolonization,” Occasional Papers in International Affairs, No. 9, December, 1964 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, Center for International Affairs, 1964), p. 64.

3 Tins issue was flatly stated in a memorandum on the Somali question, prepared by the Kenya Delegation to the Addis Ababa Summit Conference, which stated: “The principle of self-determination has relevance where FOREIGN DOMINATION is the issue. It has no relevance where the issue is territorial disintegration by dissident citizens.” Emerson, Self-Determination 35.

4 See George Ginsburgs’ “ ‘Wars of National Liberation’ and the Modern Law of Nations—the Soviet Thesis.” 29 Law and Contemporary Problems 910-942 (Autumn, 1964).