No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks: Professor Douglas E. Dayton
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Third Session
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1955
References
1 E.g., East’n Extension Tel. Co. v. U. S., 231 U. S. 326 (1913), rev’g, 48 Ct. Cl. 33 (1912); Etlimar Societe Anonyme v. U. S., 106 F. Supp. 191 (Ct. Cl. 1952). Note 28 U.S.C.A. §1502 (excluding treaty eases), and compare with Hannevig v. U. S., 84 F. Supp. 743 (Ct. Cl. 1949).
2 E.g., Swiss Confederation v. U. S., 70 F. Supp. 235 (Ct. Cl. 1947), certiorari denied, 332 U. S. 815 (1947).
3 See World War II treaty settlements as to “direct or indirect” interests; U. S. post World War II commercial treaty property protection clauses; Art. 2 (B), Settlement of Pecuniary Claims Against Yugoslavia, T.I.A.S., No. 1803; (FOA) Investment Insurance Manual, p. 4 (Oct. 15, 1954) and Economic Cooperation Act of 1948, as amended, 22 U.S.C.A. §1933 (b) (4) (H) (i).
4 Kaufman v. Société Internationale, 343 U. S. 156 (1952). See also, even more illuminating requirement that a corporation “allotment … of (holder’s) proportion of the loss or damage” be presented by claimant, Art. 1, Convention between U. S. and Mexico, Sept. 8, 1923, Treaty Series, No. 678, 43 Stat. 1730.
5 War Claims Arising Out of World War II, Supplementary Report, War Claims Commission, H. Doc. No. 67, at pp. 141–143 (83rd Cong., 1st Sess., 1953).
6 Art. XXIV (2), Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation with Israel, in force April 3, 1954, T.I.A.S., No. 2948; see the earliest form, Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation with China, Art. XXVIII, T.I.A.S., No. 1871, 43 A.J.I.L., Supp. 27 (1949).
7 Report on a Special United Nations Fund for Economic Development, U.N. Pub. E/2381 (Nov. 18, 1953); U. S. position stated, 29 Dept. of State Bulletin 839 (Dec. 14, 1953).