Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:43:15.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Legal Consequences of the Unlawful Use of Force Under the Charter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

R. R. Baxter
R. R. Baxter*
Affiliation:
Law School of Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Second Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 62 , 1968 , pp. 68 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Art. 2, par. 4.

2 E. Lauterpacht, The Legal Irrelevance of the “State of War,” at p. 62 above.

3 Ian Brownlie, International Law and the Use of Force by States 402-04 (1963).

4 Under the inherent right of collective self-defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter.

5 Falk, “International Law and the United States Eole in the Viet Nam War,” 75 Yale L.J. 1122, 1143-46 (1966); Law, Morality, and War in the Contemporary World 19 (1963).

6 Feinberg, The Legality of a “ State of War ” after the Cessation of Hostilities 70 (1961).

7 Brownlie, op. cit. a. 3 above at 418-19.

8 See Report of the Special Committee on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States, Sep. 26. 1967, at 52-53, 103 (A/6799) (1967).

9 Charter, Art. 92.

10 Charter, Art. 36, par. 3.

11 [1949] I.C.J. Rep. 4.

12 Higgins, The Development of International Law through the Political Organs of the United Nations (1963).

13 Security Council Resolution 248, March 24, 1968 (S/RES/248) (1968).

14 Res. 1105 (BS-II), Gen. Ass. Off. Rec, 2d Emerg. Sp. Sess. 6 (1956).

15 Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 428-29 (1964).

16 Kes. 1474 (ES-II), Sep. 28, 1960, Gen. Ass. Off. Eec, 4th Emerg. Sp. Sess., Supp. 1, at J (A/4510) (1960).

17 Hague Conventions Nos. III, V, XI, and XIII, Oct. 18, 1907, 2 A.J.I.L. Supp. 85 (1908).

18 See the remarks of Mr. Vyshinsky on this question in the First Committee of the General Assembly, Gen. Ass. Off. Eec, 5th Sess., 1st Comm., 413th meeting 417 (A/C.1/SB.412) (1950).

19 See letter from Mr. Sebag-Monteflore to the Observer Eeview, July 16, 1967, p. 27, col. 4.