Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T03:41:38.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments by Professor John H. E. Fried

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

John H. E. Fried*
Affiliation:
Herbert H. Lehman College, City University of New York

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Perspectives for International Legal Development
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg (Nuremberg, 1947), Vol. I, p. 223.

2 I would not agree with Mr. Forman's formulation, namely, that the U.N. Charter “reinforced the status of aggression as an international crime.” The U.N. Charter did less and more: less by being silent on crimes against peace (the term was written into the London Charter of Aug. 8, 1945, only after the adoption of the U.N. Charter on June 26, 1945); and more by prohibiting not only aggressive war but, with only specific exceptions, the use or threat of force altogether in the international relations of all Members (Art. 2, par. 4).

3 Trial of the Major War Criminals, op. cit. 223. In the same context, the Judgment declares: “That international law imposes duties and liabilities upon individuals as well as upon States has long been recognized.” (Quoting Ex Parte Quirin.)