Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:10:59.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Teaching of International Law in Undergraduate and Graduate Courses in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Third Session
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jones, Howard Mumford,Education and World Tragedy, 1946, pp. 3, 14.Google Scholar

2 H. A. Washington (ed.), The Writings o f Thomas Jefferson, 1853, Yol. I, p. 50.

3 Cook, Walter Wheeler , “ Scientific Method and the Law,” The Johns Hopkins Alumni Magazine, X V (1927), p. 213.Google Scholar

4 Remarks of Wright, Quincy, Second Conf. o f Teachers o f Int. Law and Belated Subjects (1925), Proceedings, pp. 50-51.Google Scholar

5 Hudson, Manley O. , “ Contemporary Development o f International Law, ” same,pp. 83, 85.Google Scholar

6 Hudson, Manley O. ,Fourth Conf. o f Teachers o f Int. Law and Belated Subjects (1929), Proceedings, p. 142.Google Scholar

7 Fifth Conf. o f Teachers of Int. Law and Belated Subjects (1933), Proceedings,p. 105.

8 The Outlook for International Law, 1944, pp. 1-18. Kunz, Josef L. Compare ,“ The Problem of the Progressive Development o f International Law, in Iowa Law Review, Vol. 31, p. 546: The States treat international law as law and whatever excuses they may bring forward to justify legally doubtful positions or open violations of international law, they never resort to what would be the best defense, namely to say that the rules of international law do not constitute law, and are, therefore, not legally binding upon them. The arguments of laymen and lawyers against the legal character of international law consists mostly in the lack of organization and sanction.” Google Scholar

9 Fourth Conf. o f Teachers o f Int. Law and Belated Subjects (1929), Proceedings,p. 162.

10 Quoted by Professor Hull, in Fifth Conf. o f Teachers o f Int. Law and Belated Subjects (1933), Proceedings, p. 111.

11 Bailey, Thomas A., A Diplomatic History o f the American, People, 1946 (3rd ed.), p. 869.Google Scholar

12 Corwin, Edward S. , The Constitution, and What It Means Today, 1947 (9th ed.),p. 95.Google Scholar

13 Wright, Quincy , A Study o f War, 1942, Vol. I, Ch. 13.Google Scholar

14 American Society o f Int. Law, 1946, Proceedings, p. 126.

15 See the remarks of Hudson, Manley O. and ofBorchard, Edwin M. in Second Conf.of Teachers o f Int. Law and Belated Subjects (1925), Proceedings, pp. 39, 85.Google Scholar

16 See the remarks of Charles G. Fenwick in same, p. 67.

17 Compare Emery Keves, The Anatomy o f Peace, 1945, Chs.9, 11.

18 See, on the general subject, W. B. Donham, Education fo r Responsible Living,1944, Oh. 19.

19 Compare Soulsby, H. G., The Right o f Search and the Slave Trade in Anglo-American Relations 1814-1860, 1933, in general.Google Scholar

20 Nelson, M. F. , Korea and the Old Orders in Eastern Asia, 1945, Ch. I.Google Scholar