Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:16:58.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power of Parties to Choose Law Governing Their Contracts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Willis L. M. Reese
Willis L. M. Reese*
Affiliation:
Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law, Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Third Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 54 , 1960 , pp. 48 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Compare Milliken v. Pratt, 125 Mass. 374 (1878), with the Union National Bank v. Chapman, 169 N. T. 538, 62 N. E. 672 (1902).

2 Jones v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 158 Mise. 466, 286 N.Y.S. 4 (App. Term, 1936).

3 See, e.g., Bernhard, “A nationalization of the Illinois Conflict of Laws Rules Applicable to Contracts,” 40 Ill. Law Kev. 165 (1945).

4 Auten v. Auten, 308 N. Y. 155, 124 N. E. 2d 99 (1954).

5 See, e.g., Mount Albert Borough Council v. Australasian Temperance and Mutual Life Assurance Society, Ltd., [1938] A. C. 224, 230.

6 See cases cited in Reporter's Note to §332a, Restatement, Conflict of Laws Second (Tentative Draft No. 6, 1960).

7 See, e.g., 2 Beale, Conflict of Laws §332.2 (1935) ; Cheshire, Private International Law 216 (5th ed., 1957).

8 E. Gerli & Co. v. Cunard S. S. Co., 48 F. 2d 115 (2d Cir., 1931); Commissioner v. Hyde, 82 F. 2d 174 (2d Cir., 1936).

9 Eestatement, Conflict of Laws Second, §332a, Comment c (Tentative Draft No. 6, 1960).

10 See authority cited in Reporter's Note to §332a, Restatement, Conflict of Laws Second (Tentative Draft No. 6, 1960).

11 Restatement, Conflict of Laws Second, §332a, Comment a (Tentative Draft No. 6, 1960).

12 Ibid., Comment e.

13 See, e.g., Siegelman v. Cunard White Star, Ltd., 221 F. 2d 189 (2d Cir., 1955); Fricke v. Isbrandtsen Co., F. Supp. 465 (S.D. N.T., 1957); Ehrenzweig, “Adhesion Contracts in the Conflict of Laws,” 53 Col. Law Rev. 1072 (1953).

14 Restatement, Conflict of Laws Second, §332a, Comment f (Tentative Draft No. 6, 1960).

15 This is the term used in Restatement, Conflict of Laws Second §332a (Tentative Draft No. 6, 1960); see also Fricke v. Isbrandtsen Co., cited above, noted in 58 Col. Law Eev. 274 (1958).

16 Restatement, Conflict of Laws Second, §332a, Comment g (Tentative Draft No. 6, 1960).

17 Ibid.

18 Ibid.

19 Ibid., Comment h.