Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:21:44.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neutrality and Problems of Peaceful Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Amry Vandenbosch
Amry Vandenbosch*
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fourth Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 30 , 1936 , pp. 129 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Baker, , Life and Letters of Woodrow Wilson, Vol. V, Neutrality Years, pp. 1-18 Google Scholar.

2 Vandenbosch, Neutrality of the Netherlands during the World War, p. 24.

3 Turlington, Edgar, Neutrality : Its History, Economics and Law, Vol. III. The World War Period.

4 Neutrality: Its History, Economics and Law, Vol. IV. Today and Tomorrow, by Philip C. Jessup.

5 Foreign Relations, 1915, p. 796.

6 See C. C. Hyde, “Arms Traffic from Standpoint of International Law,” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, January, 1935.

7 New York Times, Oct. 7, 1935.

8 This problem was apparently discussed at a recent meeting of the board of the Bank for International Settlements. See report in New York Times, April 7,1936.

9 Switzerland, for example, in spite of its neutralized status, is applying mild economic eanctionist measures against Italy.

10 Neutrality: Today and Tomorrow, p. 210.

11 Page 9.

12 Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1914, American Political Science Review, 1915, p. 13.

13 Quoted by Maclver, The Community, p. 410.

14 Maclver, op. cit., p. 422. This is the view underlying Art. 11 of the Covenant. It is apparently also the view of Secretary Hull. “Under the conditions which prevail in the world today a threat of hostilities anywhere cannot but be a threat to the interests—political, economic, legal and social—of all nations. Armed conflict in any part of the world cannot but have undesirable and adverse effects in every part of the world.” Statement of Sept. 11,1935, reminding Italy and Ethiopia of their obligations under the Briand-Kellogg Pact.