Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:36:58.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Neutrality Essential?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Philip C. Jessup
Philip C. Jessup*
Affiliation:
International Law, Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fourth Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 27 , 1933 , pp. 134 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 De Jure Belli ac Pacis, Lib. iii, c. xvii, iii, 1.

2 See Soderquist, , Le Blocus Maritime (1908), pp. 9 ff.Google Scholar

3 Zouche,Juris et Judicii Fecialis Sive Juris inter Gentes (1650), Classics of International Law (1911), p. 123.

4 See Jessup, and Desk, “The Early Development of the Law of Contraband of War,” XLVIII Political Science Quarterly (1933), pp. 62 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Soderquist,op. cit., p. 17; text of the treaty of 1611 in V Du Mont, Corps Diplomatique, II, p. 231.

6 Cf. . Clark, The Seventeenth Century (1929), p. 98.

7 Cheney, , “International Law under Queen Elizabeth,” 20 English Historical Review (1905) pp. 659, 662 Google Scholar.

8 British Diplomatic Instructions, 1689–4789, Vol. I (Sweden), p. 8, and Vol. III (Denmark), p. 10.

9 The treaty development is summarized in Jessup and Dal, op. cit., Vol. XLVII (1932), pp. 526 ff.

10 Cf.also, Borchard in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 27 (1933), pp. 293 ff.

11 Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A/B No. 5. See especially the dissenting opinion of Judges Anzilotti and Huber, p. 35.

12 Hudson, International Legislation, Vol. I, pp. 625, 635.

13 See League of Nations, Barcelona Conference, Verbatim reports and texts relating to the convention on Freedom of Transit (1921), pp. 104 and 147.

14 League of Nations Treaty Series, Vol. 7, pp. 51, 61.

15 British & Foreign St. Papers, Vol. 116, pp. 598, 609.

16 League of Nations Treaty Series, Vol. 36, pp. 77, 83.

17 Ibid., Vol. 47, pp. 57, 85.

18 See the writer’s American Neutrality and International Police, pp. 95–96.

19 U. S. Dept. of State, Treaty Information Supp. to Bulletin 39, p. 24, and Bulletin 40,

20 Cf. Wright in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 27 (1933), pp. 39 ff.

21 The General Pact for the Renunciation of War. (Govt. Printing Office, 1928), p. 44.

22 Ibid., pp. 51, 52.

23 Ibid., pp. 57 and 19.

24 League Doc. IX Disarmament 1932. IX. 59—Conf. D. 145.