Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:20:30.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freedom of Communications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Josef L. Kunz
Josef L. Kunz*
Affiliation:
University of Toledo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Third Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 48 , 1954 , pp. 99 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, in general, de Visscher, Ch., Le Droit des Communications (1924)Google Scholar; Kunz, Josef L., “Die Entwicklung ăes internationalen Verkehrsrechts seit den Friedensverträgen,” Zeitschrift für öffentliche Recht (Vienna), Vol. 13 (1933), pp. 408 ffGoogle Scholar.

2 See: L’Union Postale Universelle: Sa fondation et son développement (Berne, 1924; Supp. 1929); Bühler, , Der Weltpostverein (Berlin, 1930)Google Scholar.

3 See Codding, George Arthur Jr., The International Telecommunications Union. An Experiment in International Cooperation (Leiden, 1952)Google Scholar.

4 See Kunz, Josef L., “Experience and Techniques in International Administration,” Iowa Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 1 (November, 1945), pp. 40–57 Google Scholar.

5 See the latest “Draft Articles on the Continental Shelf,” prepared by the U.N. International Law Commission, General Assembly, Official Records, 8th Sess., Supp. No. 9 (A/2456, New York, 1953), especially Arts. 3, 4 and 6.

6 See Kunz, Josef L., “The Danube Regime and the Belgrade Conference,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 43 (January, 1949), pp. 104–113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Jessup, Philip C., A Modern Law of Nations (New York, 1948)Google Scholar.

8 Lauterpacht, H., International Law and Human Eights (London, 1950)Google Scholar.

9 See Sei Fujii v. California (1952), 38 Calif. (2nd.) 718. Equally the Canadian case, Re Noble & Wolf, which did not follow the decision in the earlier case, Re Drummond Wren.

10 See this writer’s editorial comment in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 43 (April, 1949), pp. 316-323.

11 Department of State Publication 3381 (January, 1949).

12 Department of State Publication 3894 (June 12, 1950).

13 U.N. Doc. E/CN. 4/Sub. 1/8R.86.

14 Eek, Hilding, Freedom of Information (Uppsala, 1953, pp. 176)Google Scholar.

15 Department of State Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 721 (April 20, 1953), pp. 579-582.