Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:04:49.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion led by Sanford Schwarz and Albert A. Roden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Second Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 30 , 1936 , pp. 45 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 United States v. Mexico, For. Rels, of U. S., 1902, App. II, pp. 15-18; American Journal of International Law, Vol. 2 (1908), 898-902.

2 See The Chorzow Factory, Judgment No. 13, Series A, No. 17, Series A/B, No. 32, 1 Hudson, World Court Rep. 646, 664; and Advisory Opinion No. 11, The Polish Postal Service in the Free City of Danzig, Series B, No. 11, Series A/B, No. 15, 1 Hudson, World Court Rep. 440, 459.

3 New Jersey v. Delaware (1933), 291 U. S. 361, 383^384.

4 International Law, p. 26.

5 (1838) 12 Pet. 657, 755; (1840) 14 Pet. 210.

6 (1907) 206 U. S. 46.

7 Art. 5 of the Budapest Articles of Interpretation of the Briand-Kellogg Pact of Paris made by the International Law Association in 1934 reads: “The signatory States are not entitled to recognize as acquired de jure any territorial or other advantages acquired de facto by means of a violation of the Pact.” And Art. II of the Argentine Anti-War Pact declares that as between the parties thereto “territorial questions must not be settled by violence, and that they will not recognize any territorial arrangement which is not obtained by pacific means, nor the validity of the occupation or acquisition of territories that may be brought about by force of arms.”