Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:19:41.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on State Succession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Sam Okunribido
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Third Session
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 60 , 1966 , pp. 117 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A similar compilation for Nigeria and Malawi may be found in I.L.A., The Effect of Independence on Treaties 65-90 (South Hackensack, N.J., 1965).

2 Falk, Appendix to Beport of Committee on Peaceful Coexistence, The New States and International Law, Proceedings and Committee Reports of the American Branch of the International Law Association 1963-1964, p. 96.

3 I.L.A., op. cit.note 1 above, at 340.

4 110 U.N. Treaty Series 4 (1951). See also 5 L.N. Treaty Series 319 (1921).

5 There is some question as to whether this agreement created a servitude or a “mere lease.” See Lester, “State Succession to Treaties in the Commonwealth,” 12 Int. and Comp. L.Q. 475, 497-498 (1963).