Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:14:51.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Misconceptions and limitations of the Monroe Doctrine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Third Session
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States, 1866, part 2, p. 413.

2 Manuscript instructions, France, No. 27, Aug. 31, 1860, XV 481, Moore’s International Law Digest, p. 480.

3 House Executive Doc. 100, 37th Cong., 2d Sess., 185–187; 52 British & Foreign State Papers, 394.

4 Dip. Cor. U. S., 1901, p. 195.

5 6 Moore’s Int. Digest, p. 596.

6 Mss. Inst. Hayti, IV, 23, 6’Moore’s Int. Dig., 474.

7 Ib., 475.

8 Dip. Cor. U. S., 1893, pp. 47–140.

9 H. Ex. Doc. 100, 37th Cong., 2d Sess., 185–187, 6 Moore’s Int. Dig., 485.

10 Dip. Cor. U. S., 1901, p. 194.

11 6 Moore’s Int. Dig., 505.

12 6 Moore’s Int. Dig., 420.

13 Report of the United States Commission, July 31, 1899, Holls, Peace Conference at The Hague. 477, 531; Compilation of Treaties in Force, 1904, p. 921.

14 Moore's Int. Dig., 528.