Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T00:18:43.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Simple Relation between the Pattern Probability and the Rate of False Signals in Control Charts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Frank K. Hwang  and
Dan Trietsch
Frank K. Hwang
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Dan Trietsch
Affiliation:
Trietsch Associates, 2804 Forest Hill Boulevard, Pacific Grove, California 93950
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A special pattern of consecutive points on a control chart often suggests that the process is out of control due to a special cause. Usually, the probability of such a pattern is not difficult to calculate, but its relation to the rate of a false signal in a control chart is unclear. In this paper we give such a relation for a wide class of patterns that includes six of the eight patterns of special cause discussed in the AT&T Statistical Quality Control Handbook (1958). We derive a surprisingly simple formula for the rate of a false signal in terms of the pattern probability and use this result to improve on the test proposed in the handbook. We also use this formula to give a simple proof of a result of Wolfowitz (1944, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 15: 163–172) and Olmstead (1945, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 17: 24–33) on the monotone sequence. Finally, we give an approximation of the rate of a false signal for another wide class of patterns that covers the two remaining patterns of special cause in the AT&T handbook.

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 315 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. AMS Problem 4755. (1958). American Mathematical Monthly 67: 533–534.Google Scholar
2. AT&T. (1958). Statistical quality control handbook, 2nd edition. Delmar, NC: AT&T.Google Scholar
3.Bissell, A.F. (1978). An attempt to unify the theory of quality control procedures. Bulletin in Applied Statistics 5: 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Godbole, A.P. (1991). Poisson approximations for runs and patterns of rare events. Advances in Applied Probabilities 23: 851–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Greenberg, I. (1970). The first occurrence of n successes in N trials. Technometrics 12: 627–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Nelson, L.S. (1984). The Shewhart control chart-Tests for special causes. Journal of Quality Control 16: 237–239.Google Scholar
7.Nelson, L.S. (1985). Interpreting Shewhart control charts. Journal of Quality Control 17: 114–116.Google Scholar
8.Olmstead, P.S. (1945). Distribution of simple arrangements for runs up and down. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 17: 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Page, E.S. (1955). Control charts with warning lines. Biometrika 42: 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Roberts, S.W. (1958). Properties of control chart zone tests. Bell System Technical Journal 37: 83–114.Google Scholar
11.Saperstein, B. (1973). On the occurrence of n successes within N Bernoulli trials. Technometrics 15: 809–818.Google Scholar
12.Wolfowitz, J. (1944). Asymptotic distributions of runs up and down. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 15: 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar