Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:10:31.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A FLUID LIMIT FOR PROCESSOR-SHARING QUEUES WEIGHTED BY FUNCTIONS OF REMAINING AMOUNTS OF SERVICE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2019

Yingdong Lu Open the ORCID record for Yingdong Lu [Opens in a new window]
Yingdong Lu*
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study a single server queue under a processor-sharing type of scheduling policy, where the weights for determining the sharing are given by functions of each job's remaining service (processing) amount, and obtain a fluid limit for the scaled measure-valued system descriptors.

Keywords

applied probabilityqueueing theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 396 - 403
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Billingsley, P. (1968). Convergence of probability measures, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Tracts on Probability and Statistics. New York, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
2.Coddington, A. & Levinson, N. (1955). Theory of ordinary differential equations. International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
3.Dunford, N. & Schwartz, J.T. (1988). Linear operators, Part 1: General theory (Vol 1). New York, USA: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
4.Gromoll, H.C., Puha, A.L., & Williams, R.J. (2002). The fluid limit of a heavily loaded processor sharing queue. Annals of Applied Probability 12(3): 797–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hairer, E., Wanner, E., Lubich, C., Wanner, G., & Gerhard Wanner, M. (2002). Geometric numerical integration: Structure-preserving algorithms for ordinary differential equations. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
6.Halmos, P. (1976). Measure theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
7.Jann, J., Browning, L.M., & Burugula, R.S. (2003). Dynamic reconfiguration: Basic building blocks for autonomic computing on IBM pseries servers. IBM Systems Journal 42(1): 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lin, M., Wierman, A., Andrew, L.L.H., & Thereska, E. (2011). Online dynamic capacity provisioning in data centers. In 2011 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), pp. 1159–1163. Piscataway, New Jersey, USA: IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Rudin, W. (1987). Real and complex analysis. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar