Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T02:21:20.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ANALYTIC APPROACH FOR THE STOCHASTIC PROJECTION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION FUND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2016

Hyungsu Kim ,
Geonwoo Kim  and
Sungchul Lee
Hyungsu Kim
Affiliation:
National Pension Research Institute, Seoul 135-811, Republic of Korea
Geonwoo Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Republic of Korea E-mail: [email protected]
Sungchul Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Republic of Korea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a stochastic method to project the public pension fund in the public pension system (PPS). For this we introduce the stochastic differential equations for the three parts: the premium revenue, the benefit expenditure, and the fund process. From these we show that the solution of the aggregated fund process is the sum of log-normals, which is approximated as one log-normal for the analytic result. Related to the parameter estimations, we implement the moment matching in the first moment. For the second moment, we apply the extreme value method following Parkinson. In order to follow Parkinson, we take the maximum and the minimum range of the fund amount based on the various sensitivity result as well as the baseline one from the deterministic projection result. In this reason, it is naturally to maintain the close interrelation with the deterministic projection result, which is very important since it is still key result in the actuarial valuation of the PPS.

Keywords

Public pension systemStochastic projectionLog-normal approximationExtreme value method
Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 196 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. American Academy of Actuaries (IAA). (2005). A guide to the use of stochastic models in analyzing social security. Issue brief.Google Scholar
2. Board of Trustees, Federal OASDI Trust Funds. (2013). The 2013 annual report of the board of trustees of the federal old-age and survivors insurance and disability insurance trust funds. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
3. Buffin, K.G. (2007). Stochastic projection methods for social security systems. Helsinki: PBSS Colloquium, International Actuarial Association.Google Scholar
4. Cairns, A. (2000). Some notes on the dynamical control of stochastic pension fund models in continuous time. ASTIN Bulletin 30: 19–55.Google Scholar
5. Cairns, A.J.G., David, B., & Kevin, D. (2006). Pricing death: Frameworks for the valuation and securitization of mortality risk. ASTIN Bulletin 36: 79–120.Google Scholar
6. Cairns, A.J.G., David, B., & Kevin, D. (2006). Stochastic lifestyling: Optimal dynamic asset allocation for defined contribution pension plans. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30: 843–877.Google Scholar
7. Cairns, A.J.G., David, B., & Kevin, D. (2008). Modelling and management of mortality risk: A review. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2–3: 79–113.Google Scholar
8. Cox, J.C., Ingersoll, J.E., & Ross, S.A. Jr. (1985). A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 53: 385–407.Google Scholar
9. Dufresne, D. (2004). The log-normal approximation in financial and other computations. Advances in Applied Probability 36: 747–773.Google Scholar
10. Heath, D., Robert, J., & Andrew, M. (1992). Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: A new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 60: 77–105.Google Scholar
11. Holmer, M.R. (2003). Methods for Stochastic Trust Fund Projection. Report prepared for the Social Security Administration Available at www.polsim.com/stochsim.pdf Google Scholar
12. IAA. (2002). Final IAA Guidelines of Actuarial Practice for Social Security Programs.Google Scholar
13. IAA. (2012). Stochastic Projections of the Financial Experience of Social Security Programs: Issues, Limitations and Alternatives.Google Scholar
14. ILO. (1998). Internal Guideline for the actuarial analysis of a national social security pension scheme.Google Scholar
15. Josa-Fombellida, R. & Rincon-Zapatero, J.P. (2004). Optimal risk management in defined benefit stochastic pension funds. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 34: 489–503.Google Scholar
16. Milevsky, M.A. & Posner, S.E. (1998). Asian options, the sum of log-normals, and the reciprocal Gamma distribution. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 33: 409–422.Google Scholar
17. Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, Canada: Office of the chief actuary. (2013). Actuarial Report (26th) on the Canada Pension Plan as at 31 December 2012. Ottawa.Google Scholar
18. Battocchio, P. & Francesco, M. 2004. Optimal pension management in a stochastic framework. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 34: 79–95.Google Scholar
19. Parkinson, M. (1980). The extreme value method for estimating the variance of the rate of return. Journal of Business 53: 61–65.Google Scholar
20. Vasicek, O. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics 5: 177–188.Google Scholar
21. Xu, J., Kannan, D., & Zhang, B. (2007). Optimal dynamic control for the defined benefit pension plans with stochastic benefit outgo. Stochastic Analysis and Applications 25: 201–236.Google Scholar