Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:35:30.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Convexity Property of a Markov-Modulated Queueing Loss System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

Michael Pinedo
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027

Abstract

In this note we consider a single-server queueing loss system with zero buffer. The arrival process is a nonstationary Markov-modulated Poisson process. The arrival process in state i is Poisson with rate λi. The process remains in state i for a time that is exponentially distributed with rate Cαi, with c being a control or speed parameter. The service rate in state i is exponentially distributed with rate μi. The process moves from state i to state j with transition probability qij. We are interested in the loss probability as a function of c. In this note we show that, under certain conditions, the loss probability decreases when the c increases. As such, this result generalizes a result obtained earlier by Fond and Ross.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chang, C.-S., Chao, X., & Pinedo, M. (1991). Monotonicity results for queues with doubly stochastic Poisson arrivals: Ross's conjecture. Advances in Applied Probability 23: 210228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Chang, C.-S. & Nelson, R. (1991). Perturbation analysis of the M/M/l queue in Markovian environment via the matrix geometric method. Research Report 75593, IBM. T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.Google Scholar
3.Du, C. (1994). A monotonicity result for a single server queue subject to a Markov modulated Poisson process. Journal of Applied Probability, forthcoming.Google Scholar
4.Fiedler, M. (1986). Special matrices and their applications in numerical mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, p. 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Fond, S. & Ross, S.M. (1978). A heterogenous arrival and service queueing loss model. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 25: 483488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Heyman, D.P. (1982). On Ross's conjecture about queues with non-stationary arrivals. Journal of Applied Probability 19: 245249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Niu, S.-C. (1980). A single server queueing loss model with heterogeneous arrival and service. Operations Research 28: 584593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Rolski, T. (1989). Queues with nonstationary inputs. Queueing Systems 5: 113130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Ross, S.M. (1978). Average delay in queues with non-stationary arrivals. Journal of Applied Probability 15: 602609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Svoronos, A. & Green, L. (1987). The N-seasons S-servers loss system. Naval Research Logistics 34: 579591.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Svoronos, A. & Green, L. (1988). A convexity result for single server exponential loss systems with non-stationary arrivals. Journal of Applied Probability 25: 224227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar