Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:32:07.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The positive gains of integration: a qualitative study of GPs' perceptions of their complementary practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

Jon Adams
Affiliation:
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Practice and Population Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Royal Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An increasing number of general practitioners (GPs) are personally practising complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to treat their NHS patients. While research on CAM is beginning to emerge we still know very little about CAM practice in primary care. Researchers have largely concentrated upon exploring CAM consumption and broad orthodox CAM provision. A small body of work has begun to examine CAM practice from the GP therapist's perspective and this work has highlighted the constraints and difficulties associated with CAM integration in general practice. Despite such limitations, direct integration continues apace and this raises the question: what clinical and practice benefits are GPs possibly gaining from CAM integration? This is an area that still lacks focused research attention and this paper, exploring the positive gains of integration as perceived by GP therapists, provides a first stage towards filling this research gap. A study, based upon 25 in-depth interviews with GPs practising CAM, was undertaken to explore GP therapists' understandings and experiences of their complementary practice. This paper presents one area of findings produced from the analysis of the GPs' accounts. Analysis reveals that GP therapists identify a number of positive clinical gains associated with their direct integrative practice. These are: filling gaps and successfully treating conditions for which conventional medicine proves ineffective; providing safer techniques in medical cases where the practitioner suspects or anticipates potential side-effects from conventional treatments; and helping maintain job satisfaction and relieve boredom for the practitioner. These findings are discussed within the context of contemporary CAM provision and consumption and recent circumstances affecting general practice. Set within this context, the findings provide an important addition to our current understanding of the increasingly close relationship between CAM and general practice. In conclusion, it is argued that the positive gains experienced by GPs practising CAM should not be ignored by those considering the future provision and practice of CAM within the general practice environment.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2003 Arnold