Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:01:45.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The integrated nursing team in primary care: views and experience of participants exploring ownership, objectives and a team orientation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

Angela Furne
Affiliation:
Joint Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston University and St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK
Fiona Ross
Affiliation:
Joint Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston University and St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK
Elizabeth (Pit) Rink
Affiliation:
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The development of integrated nursing teams consisting of district nurses, health visitors and practice nurses based in general practice is a widespread recent change in primary care. This development has been justified by promising to meet the need for a more cost-effective service, through a reduction of duplication in nursing work, improvements in the consistency of advice to patients and the provision of accessible and responsive patient care. This paper reports on topic-led qualitative interview data which were collected as part of a multimethod evaluation of various models of evolving integrated nursing teams. The overall aim of the evaluation was to explore progress towards integration by assessing nurse workload, team effectiveness and staff perception of change. The assessment of workload and team effectiveness is reported elsewhere. Staff perception of change was measured by analysis of interview data collected from 12 teams, 9 months after the implementation of nurse integration in two London health authorities in 1998. A total of 33 interviews explored nurses' interpretation of integrated nursing, their expectations relating to their changing roles and activities and their perceptions of key activities and outcomes relating to the implementation of integrated working. Although achievements were identified, including some changes in clinical practice, in general participants reported a partial and variable understanding of the concept of integrated teamwork, and there was uncertainty reported over changes in professional boundaries. A lack of ownership of the process of change and a dearth of team objectives were reported. Developments towards teambuilding were more common than strategic planning to reorganize the workload of the team collectively according to a local population-based agenda. To implement an integrated approach to primary care nursing, we suggest that there is a need for increased ownership and support for teambuilding strategies and skill development. If integrated nursing is to contribute to health improvements, it is necessary that participants agree on patient-focused objectives that orient towards a collective and locally targeted delivery of care.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2001 Arnold