Introduction
General practitioners (GPs) have played a critical role in managing/limiting transmission of COVID-19 (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wang, Ren, Tian, Zhou, Zhou, Ye, Zhao, Qiu and Li2020) since the beginning of the pandemic (Cao et al., Reference Cao, Wang, Wen, Liu, Wang, Fan, Ruan, Song, Cai, Wei, Li, Xia, Chen, Xiang, Yu, Bai, Xie, Zhang, Li, Yuan, Chen, Li, Huang, Tu, Gong, Liu, Wei, Dong, Zhou, Gu, Xu, Liu, Zhang, Li, Shang, Wang, Li, Zhou, Dong, Qu, Lu, Hu, Ruan, Luo, Wu, Peng, Cheng, Pan, Zou, Jia, Wang, Liu, Wang, Wu, Ge, He, Zhan, Qiu, Guo, Huang, Jaki, Hayden, Horby, Zhang and Wang2020). The role of GPs in China is rather unique since GPs practice as specialists in the GP Department within Secondary/Tertiary hospitals, in addition to conducting community clinics. Thus, complex patients with an uncertain diagnosis and/or serious conditions are referred from the community clinics to the GP Department within hospitals; whereas patients with a clear diagnosis and management plan are transferred back to the community clinics for routine outpatient management. Very complex patients can also be referred beyond the GP Department to specialists in specific disciplines, such as internal medicine and surgery.
During the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, the GP college in Shanghai was able to provide tailored online educational courses to meet the needs of local community doctors, designed to facilitate the implementation of proper handling procedures for patients suspected of COVID-19 infection (Shi et al., Reference Shi, Lu, Wang, Bao, Qian, Dong, Tao and Xu2020). Such online targeted training boosted self-confidence, which has enabled local doctors to manage these patients more effectively in local community clinics, including retaining many of these patients in the local communities during COVID-19 outbreaks. Overall, during the pandemic, there have been substantial changes in medical practice in most areas. To minimize/reduce potential viral transmission, many patients voluntarily reduced face-to-face visits in the GP Department (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Fan, Ding, Feng, Tao, Zhou, Qian, Tao, Hambly and Bao2021) and instead chose Internet-based consultations. Even when these patients had to come to the GP Department, they opted for larger prescriptions to minimize the frequency of hospital visits, particularly among those with quite stable chronic conditions. Our GPs were conscious of the potential risks of larger prescriptions reducing the interval between patient reviews. However, both the patients and doctors were coping with such challenges, and the outcomes were proven to be very successful.
Tongren Hospital is the only general hospital in the Changning region, supervising 10 community clinics in this region, and manages the health of nearly 700 000 people. However, it is unclear whether the pandemic during 2020 had any significant impact on GPs, particularly in relation to changed patterns of referral of patients to or from local community clinics to the GP Department of Tongren Teaching Hospital, and from the GP Department to other Discipline-specific specialists in Tongren Hospital. The aim of this study was to understand the management of patients in the Department of GP, including the referral process to different specialized departments during the most challenging event of the century, i.e., the COVID-19 pandemic.
Materials and methods
Study design
A retrospective investigation was conducted in Tongren Hospital, Shanghai from January 2019 to December 2020. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the hospital (NO. 2020-079-01) and strictly followed the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki. All the de-identified data obtained were from the electronic health record system of Tongren Hospital. These patients were requested to sign consent forms for the use of their data for medical research, in addition to medical treatments, during their routine initial registration. Therefore, we had access to these data prior to, during, and post-COVID-19 periods.
Data that were collected were from the Centre database and included all the patient data for patients who visited GP outpatient clinics in person and were transferred from community clinics to Tongren Hospital during the entire year of 2020, as well as the corresponding period in 2019. We measured patients’ age, sex, number, and proportion referred from the community to the hospital GP Department or from the hospital GP Department to the community, particularly those with hypertension and diabetes. Additionally, we measured the number and proportion of patients referred from GP Department to specialists in specific Disciplines or from specialists in specific Disciplines to the community.
Statistical analysis
Quantitative variables were expressed as means with standard deviation (SD), and qualitative variables were expressed as percentages. Differences were evaluated using the Chi-square test for categorical variables, and t test for normally distributed variables and the Mann-Whitney U nonparametric test for non-normally distributed variables after consulting with a medical statistician.
Results
Community referrals of patients to the GP department, Tongren hospital
Overall, there was a 16% drop in the number of patients transferred from community clinics to the GP Department, Tongren Hospital in 2020, compared to 2019 (11 253 vs 13 809), of which 5,580 (49.6%) or 6,870 (49.8%) were female in 2020 or 2019, respectively (Table 1, Figure 1a, P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the average age of the patients between 2020 and 2019 (57.99 ± 17.42 vs 58.43 ± 18.51 yr) (Table 1, Figure 1b, P > 0.05). On a monthly basis, the decrease in patient referrals was maximal in February/March 2020 at approximately 40%–50%, with a subsequent slow recovery through to October 2020 (Table 2, Figure 2a, P < 0.01). Notably, when the number of referrals was considered as a proportion of the total number of patients seen within the GP Department each month, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients being referred over the 12-month period in 2020 compared to 2019 (Table 2, Figure 2a, inset, P > 0.05).
Hospital GP department referrals of patients back to community clinics
The total number of patients transferred from the GP Department at Tongren Hospital back to the community clinics decreased by 11% overall in 2020 compared to that of 2019 (8,188 vs 9,509). On a monthly basis, the decrease in patient referrals was maximal in February/March at approximately 40%, with a subsequent slow recovery through to July 2020 (Table 2, Figure 2b, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the proportion of referrals compared to the total number of patients being seen within the GP Department between 2019 and 2020 (Table 2, Figure 2b, inset, P > 0.05).
Department of GP referrals of patients to specialists in specific disciplines
The patient numbers referred from the GP Department to the specific specialists in Tongren Hospital (eg internal medicine or surgery) decreased by ∼55% in 2020 compared to that in 2019 (3,034 vs 6,784, respectively). This decrease was large across all of 2020, varying between a 76% drop in February and a 31% drop in December 2020, compared to monthly data in 2019 (Figure 3a, P < 0.001). Notably, when the proportion of patients referred to the specialists versus the total number of patients seen in the GP Department was compared between 2019 and 2020, a similar pattern of difference was observed, compared to that of the absolute number, showing substantially reduced referrals from the GPs to specific-discipline specialists (Table 3, Figure 3a, inset, P < 0.001).
Specialist referral of patients back to the community clinics
The overall patient numbers that specialists in specific disciplines transferred back to the community clinics decreased by 54% in 2020 compared to that in the same period of 2019 (598 vs 1,299, respectively) (Figure 3b, P < 0.001). Interestingly, the relative number of referrals was gradually reduced from January to March 2019, then gradually increased from March and peaked in June 2019, and then slowly decreased till December 2019 (Figure 3b). Notably, when the proportion of patients referred back from the specialists versus the total number of patients seen in the GP Department were compared between 2019 and 2020, a similar pattern of difference was observed, compared to that of the absolute number, showing substantially reduced referrals from the specialists back to the GPs (Table 3, Figure 3b, inset, P < 0.001).
Management of classic chronic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic
An assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on the most common chronic diseases (hypertension and diabetes mellitus [DM]) in China was undertaken for the current study. The total number of hypertension patients referred from community clinics to the GP Department within Tongren Hospital decreased by 6% in 2020, compared to 2019 (1,238 vs 1,313, respectively), although this change was not found to be significant (Figure 4a, P > 0.05). However, surprisingly, there was a significant increase in the relative number of hypertensive patients referred as a proportion of the total number of hypertensive patients seen by GPs in 2020 compared to 2019 (Table 4, Figure 4a, inset, P < 0.01).
In contrast, there was a significant decrease in the total number of patient referrals for DM by 12% overall in 2020 compared to 2019 (1,246 vs 1,423, respectively) (Figure 4b, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the relative number (i.e. the referral number of DM patients from local clinics to GP, Tongren versus total DM patients seen in clinics) between 2019 and 2020 (Figure 4b, inset, P > 0.05).
Discussion
This study demonstrates that during 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of referrals for chronic disease patients between the GP hospital Department and community clinics and, similarly, referrals between the GP service and specialist clinical services, in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China, were substantially decreased. This outcome presages a substantial shift in the usual pattern of clinical management of patients with chronic diseases.
We and others have demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the patterns of patient visits (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Fan, Ding, Feng, Tao, Zhou, Qian, Tao, Hambly and Bao2021), including a fall in outpatient visits significantly among respiratory patients, probably due to a reduction in the usual respiratory illnesses (Sun et al., Reference Sun, Fu, Cong, Li, Xie and Wang2019). However, acute psychological problems have increased significantly (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Fan, Ding, Feng, Tao, Zhou, Qian, Tao, Hambly and Bao2021; Dong and Bouey, Reference Dong and Bouey2020; Buhagiar, Reference Buhagiar2021). It is still unclear how well the patients with chronic conditions have been able to handle the long-term impacts of COVID-19 pandemic.
The patients transferred from the community clinics to Tongren Hospital decreased by ∼20% in 2020, compared to that in 2019, although the proportion of patients transferred as a proportion of total number of patients seen within clinics remained constant. We hypothesise that this was caused by extensive propaganda for viral transmission, thus patients became unwilling to interact within the community (Xu, Reference Xu2020; Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, 2020). Thus, most of the patients were encouraged to visit local community doctors instead. Secondly, local community doctors also reduced patients’ referral to the GP Unit, Tongren Hospital, unless absolutely necessary (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Fan, Ding, Feng, Tao, Zhou, Qian, Tao, Hambly and Bao2021). Similarly, the numbers of patients referred back to the Community clinics was also reduced.
There was no significant difference in the age and sex of the referred patients from the local clinics to Tongren Hospital or vice versa.
Following the control of the outbreak of COVID-19 over the latter few months of 2020, the number of patients referred from the local clinics to the GP Department, Tongren Hospital gradually increased, almost reaching a plateau in November 2020. This is probably related to the build-up in the confidence of the general population (Li and Liu, Reference Li and Liu2020; Pahayahay and Khalili-Mahani, Reference Pahayahay and Khalili-Mahani2020), particularly among those patients with the chronic diseases described here, who had neglected consultations earlier in 2020 (Chudasama et al., Reference Chudasama, Gillies, Zaccardi, Coles, Davies, Seidu and Khunti2020). Consequently, the level of patient visits almost returned to the usual level in December 2020, compared to that in December 2019.
A similar pattern of decreased referrals to specialists was observed. Notably, GPs and specialists treat the patients in a cooperative relationship. Thus, during the pandemic, fewer patients were willing to visit major hospitals due to fear of encountering a high pathogen load, unless their condition(s) became unmanageable by the GP in the local clinics during 2020.
When the pattern of referrals for specific chronic diseases was assessed individually, we observed a substantial drop in referrals for hypertension, as a proportion of total consultations for hypertension, but not for DM. In the case of patients with hypertension, the number of patients treated for hypertension in 2020 did not change, in contrast to a significant fall in absolute patient numbers treated by the GP Department in 2020 compared to that in 2019. Overall, patients presumably choose to avoid referral to major hospitals for fear of COVID-19 contamination. However, blood pressure is regulated by two key factors: physical/vascular structures and psychological/emotional stress. The hypertensive patients’ vascular pathophysiological condition could be managed in a reasonably stable manner by the local doctors, but the impact of COVID-19 inevitably increased psychological stress, contributing to poorly controlled hypertension in some patients. Thus, although the total number of patient consultations for hypertension was maintained, referrals were reduced due to fear of COVID-19 contamination within the hospital system. Such an explanation is well supported by previous findings, showing increased numbers of anxious and insomniac patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Fan, Ding, Feng, Tao, Zhou, Qian, Tao, Hambly and Bao2021; Johnson, Reference Johnson2019; Sensoy et al., Reference Sensoy, Gunes and Ari2021).
However, we found that the absolute number of DM referrals was reduced in 2020, compared to that of 2019, maybe due to improved clinical skills of the local doctors in handling relatively complicated conditions involving these patients. However, referrals as a proportion of the number of DM patients seen within clinics did not change, probably reflecting a consistent level of diabetic complications occurring irrespective of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of course, the unwillingness of these patients to visit major hospitals also contributed to the reduced number of referrals (Daily, 2020; Eastday.com, 2020; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Tu, Yang, Hu, Wang, Hu, Cao, Jiang, Sun, Xu and Chang2020). Notably, exacerbations of DM complications are not usually directly associated with stress, compared to the impact of stress on hypertension.
In conclusion, there were significantly reduced patient referrals from the local community clinics to the GP Unit, Tongren Hospital, and vice versa, and a reduction in the referrals from GPs to specialists in Tongren Hospital. There were also reduced referrals for DM patients from local clinics to Tongren Hospital.
Telemedicine has been applied during the pandemic, particularly during the complete lockdown period amid the Omicron event (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Lu, Zhou, Feng, Hambly, Fan and Bao2022). Patients with chronically stable conditions were consulted via telemedicine, and medications were delivered by the pharmacy at Tongren Hospital through delegated delivery personnel who had been trained in preventing viral transmission. In any special and critical conditions, these patients were referred to the Emergency Department, at the few special designated COVID-19 hospitals in Shanghai. Such an approach, appreciated by both doctors and patients, could be utilized in future unprepared events.
The strength of this study lies in the unique information our data provides for practitioners during the pandemic, especially for GPs in managing patients under the most challenging conditions. Such insights could be extremely valuable in preparing for any unforeseen future events. However, we acknowledge the limitations of the current study; for example, it was conducted at a single centre within one region (Changning District, Shanghai). Therefore, the data may not fully represent the entire population of Shanghai and/or China. We intend to conduct retrospective studies in the future involving multiple centres across different regions and/or countries.
Acknowledgements
This study has been supported by grants from Key Supporting Disciplines of Shanghai Health System (Shanghai Municiple Health Commission, Grant Number 2023ZDFC0403) and the Key Discipline Projects of Shanghai Three-Year Action Plan for Public Health under Grant (Shanghai Municiple Health Commission, 24 Jan 2020, GWVI-11.1-29).
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.