Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:09:12.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses Reported by World Trade Center Response Workers and Volunteers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2012

Kara R. Perritt*
Affiliation:
Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia USA
Robin Herbert
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York USA
Stephen M. Levin
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York USA
Jacqueline Moline
Affiliation:
North Shore University Hospital, North Shore - Long Island Jewish Health System, New York, New York USA
*
Corresponding Author: Kara R. Perritt, MS National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Safety Research, 1095 Willowdale Road, MS 1808, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction: In 2002, the Mount Sinai Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, with support from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), began coordinating the World Trade Center (WTC) Worker and Volunteer Medical Screening Program (MSP) to monitor the health of qualified WTC responders. Enrolled participants were offered a clinical examination; interviewed to collect medical, mental health, and exposure information; and requested to complete a self-administered medical questionnaire. The objective of this study was to better understand work-related injuries and illnesses sustained on-site by WTC responders.

Methods: A descriptive analysis of select data from the MSP self-administered medical questionnaire was conducted. Data collected July 2002 through April 2004 from MSP participants enrolled at the Mount Sinai clinic were reviewed using univariate statistical techniques.

Results: Records from 7,810 participants were analyzed, with most participants associated with either the construction industry (n = 2,623, 34%) or law enforcement (n = 2,036, 26%). Approximately a third of the participants (n = 2,486, 32%) reported at least one injury or illness requiring medical treatment that was sustained during WTC work/volunteer activities. Of the total 4,768 injuries/illnesses reported by these participants, respiratory complaints were most common (n = 1,350, 28%), followed by traumatic injuries excluding eye injuries (n = 961, 20%), eye injuries/ailments (n = 709, 15%), chest pain (n = 375, 8%), headaches (n = 359, 8%), skin conditions (n = 178, 4%), and digestive system conditions (n = 163, 3%). Participants reported that 36% of injuries/illnesses were treated off-site and 29% were treated on-site, with the remaining not specifying treatment location. Off-site treatment was prevalent for respiratory complaints, psychological stress, and chest pain. On-site treatment was predominate for eye injuries/ailments and traumatic injuries excluding eye injuries.

Conclusion: Study results underscore the need for rapid deployment of personal protective equipment for disaster responders and medical care stations mobilized near disaster worksites. Additionally, the results, many of which are comparable to findings from previous WTC studies where data were collected in real-time, indicate that a screening program such as the MSP may be effective in retrospectively providing general information on disaster responder demographics and work-related injuries and illnesses.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright Perritt © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.New York City Fire Department: Bureau of Health Services (BHS) World Trade Center (WTC) Medical Monitoring and Treatment Program. www.nyc.gov/html/fdny/html/units/bhs/wtcmm. Accessed October 14, 2011.Google Scholar
2.Herbert, R, Moline, J, Skloot, G, et al. . The World Trade Center disaster and the health of workers: five-year assessment of a unique medical screening program. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:18531858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Stellman, JM, Smith, RP, Katz, CL, et al. . Enduring mental health morbidity and social function impairment in World Trade Center rescue, recovery, and cleanup workers: the psychological dimension of an environmental health disaster. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:12481253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Berríos-Torres, SI, Greenko, JA, Phillips, M, et al. . World Trade Center rescue worker injury and illness surveillance, New York, 2001. Am J Prev Med 2003;25:7987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Perritt, KR, Boal, WL, The Helix Group Inc. Injuries and illnesses treated at the World Trade Center, 14 September-20 November 2001. Prehosp Disaster Med 2005;20:177183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injuries and illnesses among New York City Fire Department rescue workers after responding to the World Trade Center attacks. MMWR 2002;51(Special Issue):15.Google Scholar
7.Bureau of Labor Statistics: Occupational Injury and Illness Classification Manual, September 2007. www.bls.gov/iif/oshoiics.htm. Accessed October 14, 2011.Google Scholar
8.SAS: SAS Version 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2007.Google Scholar
9.Levin, S, Herbert, R, Skloot, G, et al. : Health effects of World Trade Center site workers. Am J Ind Med 2002;42:545547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Spadafora, R: Firefighter safety and health issues at the World Trade Center site. Am J Ind Med 2002;42:532538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Physical health status of World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers and volunteers — New York City, July 2002–August 2004. MMWR 2004;53:807812.Google Scholar
12.Andersen, LP, Mikkelsen, KL: Recall of occupational injuries: a comparison of questionnaire and diary data. Saf Sci 2008;46:255260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Jackson, BA, Peterson, DJ, Bartis, JT, et al. : Protecting Emergency Responders: Lessons Learned from Terrorist Attacks. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2002.Google Scholar
14.Jackson, BA, Baker, JC, Ridgely, MS, et al. : Protecting Emergency Responders, Volume 3: Safety Management in Disaster and Terrorism Response. Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2004.Google Scholar