Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:29:21.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“We decide according to the protocol”: Humanitarian Healthcare Workers’ Moral Experiences of Palliative Care-Related Decision-Making in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Rachel Yantzi
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Md Hadiuzzaman
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
Pradip Sen Gupta
Affiliation:
Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Amin Lamrous
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières, Barcelona, Spain
Kathryn Richardson
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, Netherlands
John Pringle
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières, Barcelona, Spain
Lisa Schwartz
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Puspita Hossain
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
David Kizito
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
Sakib Burza
Affiliation:
Médecins Sans Frontières, Barcelona, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

919,000 Rohingya refugees live in overcrowded camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh after fleeing violence in Myanmar. The Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) Goyalmara Hospital offers the highest level of pediatric and neonatal care serving the Rohingya refugees and palliative care is gradually being integrated due to high mortality and medical complexity of patients. The purpose of this study was to understand the moral experiences of staff involved in providing palliative care to inform program implementation at Goyalmara Hospital and in other humanitarian contexts.

Method:

This focused ethnography was conducted between March-August 2021 at Goyalmara Hospital. Data collection involved participant-observation, individual interviews (22), focus group discussions (5), and analysis of protocols and other documents. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, translated, and transcribed. A coding scheme was developed, and data coded using NVivo 11.

Results:

A key finding of this study was the important yet contested role of clinical guidelines and policies in palliative care related decision-making which was shaped by the authority and impermanent presence of international staff in the project. Staff saw clinical guidelines as a valuable resource that supported a consistent approach to care over time, and some locally hired staff used clinical guidelines as a tool to support their point of view during care planning discussions with international staff. Others felt that palliative care guidelines and other policies were inappropriately or rigidly applied, particularly surrounding decisions to refer (or not refer) patients to a higher level of care, or to discontinue certain medical treatments at end of life.

Conclusion:

MSF staff experienced tension between the need for clarity and consistency, and the need to tailor guidelines to the context, patient, and family. Open discussion of staff concerns may alleviate moral distress and alert teams to areas where advocacy, staff psycho-social support, training, or clinical mentoring are needed.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine