Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:22:22.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volume Resuscitation — A Comparison of Delivery Rates for Various Fluids and Catheters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Donald S. Blythe ,
Charles J. Fisher Jr  and
Garrett E. Foulke
Donald S. Blythe
Affiliation:
From the Critical Care/Emergency Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
Charles J. Fisher Jr
Affiliation:
From the Critical Care/Emergency Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
Garrett E. Foulke
Affiliation:
From the Critical Care/Emergency Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is controversy concerning the best method for rapid fluid administration in shock secondary to severe or continuing blood loss. Some authors recommend immediate cutdown, while others support percutaneous central intravenous lines. In addition, the data available on maximum flow rates for various catheters is limited and does not compare different solutions. To gain more insight into these problems we have studied the flow rates for different lengths and gauges of catheters utilizing various physiologic solutions.

Type
Part II: Clinical Care Topics
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 1 , supplement S1: Disaster Resuscitology , 1985 , pp. 176 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ellis, BW, Dudley, HAF. Intravenous therapy and blood transfusion, in Dudley, HAF (ed). Hamilton Bailey's Emergency Surgery, ed 10. Bristol, England: John Wright & Sons, 1977; pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
2. Wilson, FR, Lucas, CE. The initial evaluation and management of the severely injured patient, in Walt, AF, Wilson, RF (eds). Management of Trauma: Pitfalls and Practice. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1975; pp. 102–103.Google Scholar
3. Shires, GT,in Schwartz, SI (ed). Pnnciples of Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969; pp. 153–154.Google Scholar
4. Zuidema, GD, Cameron, JL. Initial evaluation and treatment of the injured patient, in Ballinger, WF, Rutherford, RB, Zuidema, GD (eds). The Management of Trauma, ed 2. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Co., 1973; p. 2.Google Scholar
5. Early Care of the Injured Patient. Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co., 1972; pp. 26–28.Google Scholar
6. Dailey, RH. Flow rate variance of commonly used IV units. JACEP 1973;2:341–342.Google Scholar