Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:44:44.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Medical Supplies at the Roskilde Festival 2016: A Prospective Observational Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2021

Mads Lønnee
Affiliation:
Herlev Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care Science Unit, Herlev Hospital, Denmark
Kenneth Geving Andersen*
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
Søren Stagelund
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
Ole Christensen
Affiliation:
Festival Medical Logistics, Roskilde Festival, Roskilde, Denmark
Kim Wildgaard
Affiliation:
Herlev Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care Science Unit, Herlev Hospital, Denmark
*
Correspondence: Kenneth Geving Andersen, MD, PhD, DMSci, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600 Køge, Denmark, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

Music festivals are popular events often including camping at the festival site. A mix of music, alcohol, drugs, and limited hygiene increases health risks. This study aimed to assess the use of medical supplies at a major music festival, thereby aiding planning at similar events in the future.

Method:

The Medical Health Care Organization (MHCO) at Roskilde Festival 2016 (Denmark) collected prospective data on disposable medical supply use and injuries and illnesses presenting to the MHCO.

Results:

A total of 12,830 patient presentations were registered by the MHCO and a total of 104 different types of disposable medical supplies were used by the MHCO from June 25, 2016 through July 3, 2016. Out of 12,830 cases, 594 individuals (4.6%) had a potential or manifest medical emergency, 6,670 (52.0%) presented with minor injuries, and 5,566 (43.4%) presented with minor illnesses. The overall patient presentation rate (PPR) was 99.0/1,000 attendees and the transport-to-hospital rate (TTHR) was 2.1/1,000 attendees. For medical emergencies, the most frequently used supplies were aluminum rescue blankets (n = 627), non-rebreather masks (n = 121), and suction catheters for an automatic suction unit (ASU) for airway management (n = 83). Most used diagnostic equipment were blood glucose test strips (n = 1,155), electrocardiogram electrodes (n = 960), and urinary test strips (n = 400). The most frequently used personal protection equipment were non-sterile gloves (n = 1,185 pairs) and sterile gloves (n = 189).

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates a substantial use of disposable medical supplies at a major music festival. The results provide aid for planning similar mass-gathering (MG) events.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lund, A, Turris, SA. Mass-gathering medicine: risks and patient presentations at a 2-day electronic dance music event. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(3):271278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, KP, Carmicheal, FJ, Goode, JE. Medical services for outdoor rock music festivals. Can Med Assoc J. 1982;126(8):935938.Google ScholarPubMed
Stagelund, S, Jans, Ø, Nielsen, K, Jans, H, Wildgaard, K. Medical care and organization at the 2012 Roskilde Music Festival: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(9):10861092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ounanian, LL, Salinas, C, Shear, CL, Rodney, WMM. Medical care at the 1982 US festival. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):520527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsten, AM, Seaman, KG, Liu, P, Bissell, RA, Maguire, BJ. Variables influencing medical usage rates, injury patterns, and levels of care for mass gatherings. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18(4):334346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, MS, Plocki, A, Likourezos, A, et al. A prospective analysis of patients presenting for medical attention at a large electronic dance music festival. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(1):7882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, FM, Kleinman, G, Suner, S, St. Jean J. Development of an equipment and supply list for emergency medical services delivery at an annual air show. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1999;14(2):6871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrillo, SJ. Medical care at mass gatherings: considerations for physician involvement. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995;10(4):273275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, RB, Petrilli, R, Noji, E. Provision for Emergency Medical Care for Crowds. 1st edition. Irving, Texas USA: American College of Emergency Physicians; 1996:130.Google Scholar
Blandford, AG, Dunlop, HA. Glastonbury fair. Some medical aspects of a rock music festival. Practitioner. 1972;209(250):205211.Google ScholarPubMed
Stagelund, S, Andersen, KG, Søe, J, Roslind, M, Wildgaard, K. Use of medication at the Roskilde (Denmark) Music Festival 2015 – a prospective observational study of 15,133 treated attendees. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(4):407414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, MB, Lund, A, Golby, R, Turris, SA. Observed benefits to on-site medical services during an annual 5-day electronic dance music event with harm reduction services. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(2):228234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackermann, O, Lahm, A, Pfohl, M, et al. Patient care at the 2010 love parade in Duisburg, Germany: clinical experiences. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:483489.Google Scholar
Lim, MSC, Bowring, AL, Gold, J, Aitken, CK, Hellard, ME. Trends in sexual behavior, testing, and knowledge in young people; 2006-2011. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(11):831834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miro, O, Galicia, M, Dargan, P, et al. Intoxication by gamma hydroxybutyrate and related analogues: clinical characteristics and comparison between pure intoxication and that combined with other substances of abuse. Toxicol Lett. 2017;277:8491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed