Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:25:41.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a Multidisciplinary Guideline for Psychosocial Crisis Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Wera Hoof
Affiliation:
ARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Diemen, Netherlands
Noortje Jansen
Affiliation:
ARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Charlie Steen
Affiliation:
ARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

The Dutch Multidisciplinary Guideline for Psychosocial support during Disasters and Crises (2014) contains general principles and recommendations for mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) to those affected by disasters, crises or other potentially traumatic events. Changes in the field of MHPSS, ‘new’ types of crises (such as social unrest and long-term crises) as well as new (scientific) knowledge have been identified. A revision of the guideline is therefore necessary to ensure that the document is in line with the current scientific evidence and practice.

Method:

The aim of the revision is to regain national consensus on the updated recommendations for providing optimal MHPSS in the event of disasters and crises. Needs and challenges identified in the national field formed the basis for the revision, together with the existing recommendations from 2014. The setup of the revised guideline is in accordance with the Dutch EBRO method [Evidence Based Guideline Development]. The knowledge input was twofold: first, a systematic literature search was conducted in PsycINFO, Ovid Medline, Embase en PTSDpubs. Further, a multidisciplinary working group was formed with representatives from the domains of practice, policy and research. A consensus process was followed to test and revise the guideline.

Results:

The literature search yielded 3,845 unique articles and 180 met the inclusion criteria. Based on the scoping review, supplemented with literature and expert knowledge, the recommendations have been updated and revised. The majority of the recommendations are still valid. They have been adapted based on current literature. Knowledge of the two new themes: ‘long-term and creeping crises’ and ‘social media’ is translated into recommendations in the field of MHPSS.

Conclusion:

The revision will lead to a more complete starting point for additional guidelines, perspective for action and protocols for specific users and applications.

Type
Tabletop Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine